Abstract
This article offers a Gramscian response to the theory of post-hegemony, suggesting that its rejection of Gramsci rests on misrepresentations of his work. Through a closer engagement with this work, the article outlines the ways in which Gramscian analysis can in fact complement the insights of post-hegemony in analysing the ways in which the social order is secured and the strategies of resistance to this order. This combination of Gramscian and post-hegemonic insights, the article argues, offers a more nuanced and comprehensive insight into power, radical politics and resistance in the twenty-first century, an insight which risks being lost in post-hegemony's rejection of Gramsci and his work. The utility of this combined approach is illustrated via four short vignettes from contemporary Latin America: the emergence of the student protest movement in Chile since 2011; the Caracazo in Venezuela; the Argentine crisis in 2001; and the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 489-502 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Contemporary Politics |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 27 Oct 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- post-hegemony
- Gramsci
- consent
- the multitude
- counter-hegemony
- Latin America