Nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis source tracing: is it really feasible in Australia?

A B Pierce, Jude Armishaw, Brian Price, Edwina Jane Wright, Elizabeth M Dax, Christopher K Fairley, Jennifer F Hoy

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOther

Abstract

Objective: A Swiss nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis (NPEP) source-tracing study successfully reduced unnecessary NPEP prescriptions by recruiting and testing source partners of unknown HIV serostatus. The Victorian NPEP Service in Australia attempted to replicate this study with the addition of HIV rapid testing and a mobile service. Methods: Patients presenting to two busy NPEP sites who reported a source partner of unknown HIV status were routinely asked if their source could be traced. If the exposed person indicated that their source partner was traceable they were asked to contact them and discuss the possibility of having an HIV test. Results: No sources were enrolled and the study was terminated. Conclusion: We hypothesize that there are a number of differences between Australia and Switzerland that make source tracing unfeasible in Australia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)436 - 438
Number of pages3
JournalHIV Medicine
Volume13
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this

@article{621d77d4c81a4808872fed0b46cc4224,
title = "Nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis source tracing: is it really feasible in Australia?",
abstract = "Objective: A Swiss nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis (NPEP) source-tracing study successfully reduced unnecessary NPEP prescriptions by recruiting and testing source partners of unknown HIV serostatus. The Victorian NPEP Service in Australia attempted to replicate this study with the addition of HIV rapid testing and a mobile service. Methods: Patients presenting to two busy NPEP sites who reported a source partner of unknown HIV status were routinely asked if their source could be traced. If the exposed person indicated that their source partner was traceable they were asked to contact them and discuss the possibility of having an HIV test. Results: No sources were enrolled and the study was terminated. Conclusion: We hypothesize that there are a number of differences between Australia and Switzerland that make source tracing unfeasible in Australia.",
author = "Pierce, {A B} and Jude Armishaw and Brian Price and Wright, {Edwina Jane} and Dax, {Elizabeth M} and Fairley, {Christopher K} and Hoy, {Jennifer F}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00986.x",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "436 -- 438",
journal = "HIV Medicine",
issn = "1464-2662",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

Nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis source tracing: is it really feasible in Australia? / Pierce, A B; Armishaw, Jude; Price, Brian; Wright, Edwina Jane; Dax, Elizabeth M; Fairley, Christopher K; Hoy, Jennifer F.

In: HIV Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 7, 2012, p. 436 - 438.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOther

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis source tracing: is it really feasible in Australia?

AU - Pierce, A B

AU - Armishaw, Jude

AU - Price, Brian

AU - Wright, Edwina Jane

AU - Dax, Elizabeth M

AU - Fairley, Christopher K

AU - Hoy, Jennifer F

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Objective: A Swiss nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis (NPEP) source-tracing study successfully reduced unnecessary NPEP prescriptions by recruiting and testing source partners of unknown HIV serostatus. The Victorian NPEP Service in Australia attempted to replicate this study with the addition of HIV rapid testing and a mobile service. Methods: Patients presenting to two busy NPEP sites who reported a source partner of unknown HIV status were routinely asked if their source could be traced. If the exposed person indicated that their source partner was traceable they were asked to contact them and discuss the possibility of having an HIV test. Results: No sources were enrolled and the study was terminated. Conclusion: We hypothesize that there are a number of differences between Australia and Switzerland that make source tracing unfeasible in Australia.

AB - Objective: A Swiss nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis (NPEP) source-tracing study successfully reduced unnecessary NPEP prescriptions by recruiting and testing source partners of unknown HIV serostatus. The Victorian NPEP Service in Australia attempted to replicate this study with the addition of HIV rapid testing and a mobile service. Methods: Patients presenting to two busy NPEP sites who reported a source partner of unknown HIV status were routinely asked if their source could be traced. If the exposed person indicated that their source partner was traceable they were asked to contact them and discuss the possibility of having an HIV test. Results: No sources were enrolled and the study was terminated. Conclusion: We hypothesize that there are a number of differences between Australia and Switzerland that make source tracing unfeasible in Australia.

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00986.x/abstract

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00986.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00986.x

M3 - Letter

VL - 13

SP - 436

EP - 438

JO - HIV Medicine

JF - HIV Medicine

SN - 1464-2662

IS - 7

ER -