No change in social decision-making following transcranial direct current stimulation of the right temporoparietal junction

Laura F. Blair-West, Kate E. Hoy, Phillip J. Hall, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Bernadette M. Fitzgibbon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) is thought to play an important role in social cognition and pro-social decision-making. One way to explore this link is through the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation method that is able to modulate cortical activity. The aim of this research was therefore to determine whether anodal tDCS to the rTPJ altered response to a social decision-making task. In this study, 34 healthy volunteers participated in a single-center, double-blinded, sham-controlled crossover design. Subjects received 20 min of active/sham anodal tDCS to the rTPJ before undertaking the Ultimatum Game (UG), a neuroeconomics paradigm in which participants are forced to choose between monetary reward and punishing an opponent's unfairness. Contrary to expectations, we found no significant difference between anodal and sham stimulation with regard to either the total number or reaction time of unfair offer rejections in the UG. This study draws attention to methodological issues in tDCS studies of the rTPJ, and highlights the complexity of social decision-making in the UG.

Original languageEnglish
Article number258
Number of pages8
JournalFrontiers in Neuroscience
Volume12
Issue numberAPR
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Apr 2018

Keywords

  • Altruistic punishment
  • Mentalizing
  • Right temporoparietal junction
  • Social decision-making
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation
  • Ultimatum Game

Cite this

@article{a196d25d289d48b295f622a0a9df2f34,
title = "No change in social decision-making following transcranial direct current stimulation of the right temporoparietal junction",
abstract = "The right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) is thought to play an important role in social cognition and pro-social decision-making. One way to explore this link is through the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation method that is able to modulate cortical activity. The aim of this research was therefore to determine whether anodal tDCS to the rTPJ altered response to a social decision-making task. In this study, 34 healthy volunteers participated in a single-center, double-blinded, sham-controlled crossover design. Subjects received 20 min of active/sham anodal tDCS to the rTPJ before undertaking the Ultimatum Game (UG), a neuroeconomics paradigm in which participants are forced to choose between monetary reward and punishing an opponent's unfairness. Contrary to expectations, we found no significant difference between anodal and sham stimulation with regard to either the total number or reaction time of unfair offer rejections in the UG. This study draws attention to methodological issues in tDCS studies of the rTPJ, and highlights the complexity of social decision-making in the UG.",
keywords = "Altruistic punishment, Mentalizing, Right temporoparietal junction, Social decision-making, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Ultimatum Game",
author = "Blair-West, {Laura F.} and Hoy, {Kate E.} and Hall, {Phillip J.} and Fitzgerald, {Paul B.} and Fitzgibbon, {Bernadette M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "19",
doi = "10.3389/fnins.2018.00258",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Frontiers in Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-453X",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "APR",

}

No change in social decision-making following transcranial direct current stimulation of the right temporoparietal junction. / Blair-West, Laura F.; Hoy, Kate E.; Hall, Phillip J.; Fitzgerald, Paul B.; Fitzgibbon, Bernadette M.

In: Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 12, No. APR, 258, 19.04.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - No change in social decision-making following transcranial direct current stimulation of the right temporoparietal junction

AU - Blair-West, Laura F.

AU - Hoy, Kate E.

AU - Hall, Phillip J.

AU - Fitzgerald, Paul B.

AU - Fitzgibbon, Bernadette M.

PY - 2018/4/19

Y1 - 2018/4/19

N2 - The right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) is thought to play an important role in social cognition and pro-social decision-making. One way to explore this link is through the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation method that is able to modulate cortical activity. The aim of this research was therefore to determine whether anodal tDCS to the rTPJ altered response to a social decision-making task. In this study, 34 healthy volunteers participated in a single-center, double-blinded, sham-controlled crossover design. Subjects received 20 min of active/sham anodal tDCS to the rTPJ before undertaking the Ultimatum Game (UG), a neuroeconomics paradigm in which participants are forced to choose between monetary reward and punishing an opponent's unfairness. Contrary to expectations, we found no significant difference between anodal and sham stimulation with regard to either the total number or reaction time of unfair offer rejections in the UG. This study draws attention to methodological issues in tDCS studies of the rTPJ, and highlights the complexity of social decision-making in the UG.

AB - The right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) is thought to play an important role in social cognition and pro-social decision-making. One way to explore this link is through the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation method that is able to modulate cortical activity. The aim of this research was therefore to determine whether anodal tDCS to the rTPJ altered response to a social decision-making task. In this study, 34 healthy volunteers participated in a single-center, double-blinded, sham-controlled crossover design. Subjects received 20 min of active/sham anodal tDCS to the rTPJ before undertaking the Ultimatum Game (UG), a neuroeconomics paradigm in which participants are forced to choose between monetary reward and punishing an opponent's unfairness. Contrary to expectations, we found no significant difference between anodal and sham stimulation with regard to either the total number or reaction time of unfair offer rejections in the UG. This study draws attention to methodological issues in tDCS studies of the rTPJ, and highlights the complexity of social decision-making in the UG.

KW - Altruistic punishment

KW - Mentalizing

KW - Right temporoparietal junction

KW - Social decision-making

KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation

KW - Ultimatum Game

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046106111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2018.00258

DO - 10.3389/fnins.2018.00258

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience

SN - 1662-453X

IS - APR

M1 - 258

ER -