New rules and record keeping

Supporting redress for survivors of child abuse

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Redress for survivors of harm, including the large number of individuals who were abused as children while in institutional care, invokes complex and contested areas of law, particularly where it involves litigation and disputes over evidence about long past events. This has already been documented in numerous inquiries and is currently being further examined in the context of the ongoing Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Ensuring appropriate legal redress for survivors of institutional abuse (and other forms of abuse) is an important imperative. However those claimants and their legal advisers currently face major challenges and obstacles in obtaining the documentary evidence necessary for the litigation process, due to shortcomings in record keeping laws and the absence of standards in the past:
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)43 - 47
    Number of pages5
    JournalAlternative Law Journal
    Volume41
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Cite this

    @article{d9a36d8f73334c529961902b20947040,
    title = "New rules and record keeping: Supporting redress for survivors of child abuse",
    abstract = "Redress for survivors of harm, including the large number of individuals who were abused as children while in institutional care, invokes complex and contested areas of law, particularly where it involves litigation and disputes over evidence about long past events. This has already been documented in numerous inquiries and is currently being further examined in the context of the ongoing Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Ensuring appropriate legal redress for survivors of institutional abuse (and other forms of abuse) is an important imperative. However those claimants and their legal advisers currently face major challenges and obstacles in obtaining the documentary evidence necessary for the litigation process, due to shortcomings in record keeping laws and the absence of standards in the past:",
    author = "Paterson, {Moira Rosalind Petrides} and Melissa Castan",
    year = "2016",
    language = "English",
    volume = "41",
    pages = "43 -- 47",
    journal = "Alternative Law Journal",
    issn = "1037-969X",
    publisher = "Legal Service Bulletin Co-operative Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    New rules and record keeping : Supporting redress for survivors of child abuse. / Paterson, Moira Rosalind Petrides; Castan, Melissa.

    In: Alternative Law Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2016, p. 43 - 47.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - New rules and record keeping

    T2 - Supporting redress for survivors of child abuse

    AU - Paterson, Moira Rosalind Petrides

    AU - Castan, Melissa

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Redress for survivors of harm, including the large number of individuals who were abused as children while in institutional care, invokes complex and contested areas of law, particularly where it involves litigation and disputes over evidence about long past events. This has already been documented in numerous inquiries and is currently being further examined in the context of the ongoing Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Ensuring appropriate legal redress for survivors of institutional abuse (and other forms of abuse) is an important imperative. However those claimants and their legal advisers currently face major challenges and obstacles in obtaining the documentary evidence necessary for the litigation process, due to shortcomings in record keeping laws and the absence of standards in the past:

    AB - Redress for survivors of harm, including the large number of individuals who were abused as children while in institutional care, invokes complex and contested areas of law, particularly where it involves litigation and disputes over evidence about long past events. This has already been documented in numerous inquiries and is currently being further examined in the context of the ongoing Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Ensuring appropriate legal redress for survivors of institutional abuse (and other forms of abuse) is an important imperative. However those claimants and their legal advisers currently face major challenges and obstacles in obtaining the documentary evidence necessary for the litigation process, due to shortcomings in record keeping laws and the absence of standards in the past:

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983316461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 41

    SP - 43

    EP - 47

    JO - Alternative Law Journal

    JF - Alternative Law Journal

    SN - 1037-969X

    IS - 1

    ER -