New insights into rights offerings as signals of firm quality: evidence from Australia

Balasingham Balachandran, Robert Faff, Michael Theobald

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Australian companies can choose among three different types of rights offerings: full standby (also known as “fully underwritten”); uninsured (or “non-underwritten”); and partial standby (“partly underwritten”). At the same time, each of these three kinds of rights offerings can be either renounceable or non-renounceable, with the former providing securities that can be sold while in the latter case the rights are forfeited if not exercised. The main argument of this paper is that managers effectively signal the quality of their company through their choice of rights issue method. Consistent with this argument, the authors summarize the findings of their own research showing that high-quality companies tend to choose full standby rights issues, with the full backing of an underwriter playing a “certifying” role for investors. By contrast, low-quality firms tend to use partial standby issues with large subscription price discounts, while companies of intermediate-quality choose uninsured rights issues. The authors also provide evidence that full standby rights issues are positively correlated with expected shareholder takeup, while both partial standby and uninsured issues have a negative correlation with takeup. Consistent with the above findings, the market response is most positive (or least negative) in the case of non-renounceable, full standby rights issues with relatively low price discounts. The market reaction is most negative for non-renounceable, partial standby issues with high price discounts.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)80-85
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Applied Corporate Finance
    Volume21
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Cite this