Abstract
Although we are beginning to understand the neurocognitive processes that underlie the emergence of dreaming, what accounts for the bizarre phenomenology of dreams remains debated. I address this question by comparing dreaming with waking mind wandering and challenging previous accounts that utilize bizarreness to mark a sharp divide between conscious experiences in waking and sleeping. Instead, I propose that bizarreness is a common, non-deficient feature of spontaneous offline simulations occurring across the sleep-wake cycle and can be tied to the specific characteristics of spontaneous thought as being dynamic, unconstrained, (hyper)associative, and highly variable in content. Rather than misrepresenting waking reality, bizarreness can be employed to investigate the very building blocks of spontaneous cognition. The absence of bizarreness in thought processes is imposed by automatic and deliberate cognitive constraints. By contrast, thought and memory processes operating on their own without such constraints are inherently marked by different degrees and types of bizarreness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1072-1101 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Philosophical Psychology |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- autobiographical memory
- default mode network
- dreaming
- mind-wandering
- sleep
- spontaneous thought
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver