Projects per year
Abstract
Network meta-analysis allows researchers to synthesise both direct and indirect evidence, thus enabling simultaneous comparisons of multiple treatments. A relatively recent addition to evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine, this approach has become increasingly popular. Yet, the underlying assumptions of network meta-analyses, which drive the validity of their findings, have been frequently ignored. In this article, we discuss the strengths and limitations of network meta-analyses. In addition, we present an overview of published network meta-analyses in reproductive medicine, summarize their challenges and provide insights into future research opportunities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1723-1731 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Human Reproduction |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2020 |
Keywords
- certainty of evidence
- evidence synthesis
- infertility
- meta-analysis
- network meta-analysis
- reporting
- reproductive medicine
- systematic review
- transitivity
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Towards sustainable evidence-based pathways in perinatology and reproductive medicine: evidence synthesis in women's health on a global scale.
Mol, B. (Primary Chief Investigator (PCI))
NHMRC - National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
1/01/20 → 31/12/24
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver