Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Network meta-analyses in reproductive medicine: challenges and opportunities

  • Rui Wang
  • , Anna Lene Seidler
  • , Lisa Askie
  • , Robert J. Norman
  • , Siladitya Bhattacharya
  • , Madelon van Wely
  • , Ben Willem Mol

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Network meta-analysis allows researchers to synthesise both direct and indirect evidence, thus enabling simultaneous comparisons of multiple treatments. A relatively recent addition to evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine, this approach has become increasingly popular. Yet, the underlying assumptions of network meta-analyses, which drive the validity of their findings, have been frequently ignored. In this article, we discuss the strengths and limitations of network meta-analyses. In addition, we present an overview of published network meta-analyses in reproductive medicine, summarize their challenges and provide insights into future research opportunities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1723-1731
Number of pages9
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume35
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2020

Keywords

  • certainty of evidence
  • evidence synthesis
  • infertility
  • meta-analysis
  • network meta-analysis
  • reporting
  • reproductive medicine
  • systematic review
  • transitivity

Cite this