Neighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion

Rebecca Wickes, Renee Zahnow, Jonathan Corcoran, John R. Hipp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Given the importance of the neighbourhood context for residents’ social cohesion, the current study examines the association between types of social and non-social places on three indicators of social cohesion: neighbour networks, social cohesion and neighbourhood attachment. We spatially integrate data from the census, topographic databases and a 2012 survey of 4132 residents from 148 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia, and employ multilevel models to assess whether the variation in resident reports of social cohesion is attributable to land uses that function as neighbourhood social conduits. We also consider the degree to which neighbourhood fragmentation affects our indicators of social cohesion. Our findings reveal that even after controlling for the socio-demographic context of the neighbourhood and a range of individual and household control variables, residents’ reports of social cohesion are significantly associated with the types of social conduits, the diversity of land use and the degree of neighbourhood fragmentation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226-248
Number of pages23
JournalUrban Studies
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • built environment
  • community
  • diversity/cohesion/segregation
  • land use
  • neighbourhood
  • place attachment
  • social interaction

Cite this

Wickes, Rebecca ; Zahnow, Renee ; Corcoran, Jonathan ; Hipp, John R. / Neighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion. In: Urban Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 226-248.
@article{ce0969e4579942cdb5503fd58fd3d07c,
title = "Neighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion",
abstract = "Given the importance of the neighbourhood context for residents’ social cohesion, the current study examines the association between types of social and non-social places on three indicators of social cohesion: neighbour networks, social cohesion and neighbourhood attachment. We spatially integrate data from the census, topographic databases and a 2012 survey of 4132 residents from 148 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia, and employ multilevel models to assess whether the variation in resident reports of social cohesion is attributable to land uses that function as neighbourhood social conduits. We also consider the degree to which neighbourhood fragmentation affects our indicators of social cohesion. Our findings reveal that even after controlling for the socio-demographic context of the neighbourhood and a range of individual and household control variables, residents’ reports of social cohesion are significantly associated with the types of social conduits, the diversity of land use and the degree of neighbourhood fragmentation.",
keywords = "built environment, community, diversity/cohesion/segregation, land use, neighbourhood, place attachment, social interaction",
author = "Rebecca Wickes and Renee Zahnow and Jonathan Corcoran and Hipp, {John R.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0042098018780617",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "226--248",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Neighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion. / Wickes, Rebecca; Zahnow, Renee; Corcoran, Jonathan; Hipp, John R.

In: Urban Studies, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2019, p. 226-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion

AU - Wickes, Rebecca

AU - Zahnow, Renee

AU - Corcoran, Jonathan

AU - Hipp, John R.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Given the importance of the neighbourhood context for residents’ social cohesion, the current study examines the association between types of social and non-social places on three indicators of social cohesion: neighbour networks, social cohesion and neighbourhood attachment. We spatially integrate data from the census, topographic databases and a 2012 survey of 4132 residents from 148 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia, and employ multilevel models to assess whether the variation in resident reports of social cohesion is attributable to land uses that function as neighbourhood social conduits. We also consider the degree to which neighbourhood fragmentation affects our indicators of social cohesion. Our findings reveal that even after controlling for the socio-demographic context of the neighbourhood and a range of individual and household control variables, residents’ reports of social cohesion are significantly associated with the types of social conduits, the diversity of land use and the degree of neighbourhood fragmentation.

AB - Given the importance of the neighbourhood context for residents’ social cohesion, the current study examines the association between types of social and non-social places on three indicators of social cohesion: neighbour networks, social cohesion and neighbourhood attachment. We spatially integrate data from the census, topographic databases and a 2012 survey of 4132 residents from 148 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia, and employ multilevel models to assess whether the variation in resident reports of social cohesion is attributable to land uses that function as neighbourhood social conduits. We also consider the degree to which neighbourhood fragmentation affects our indicators of social cohesion. Our findings reveal that even after controlling for the socio-demographic context of the neighbourhood and a range of individual and household control variables, residents’ reports of social cohesion are significantly associated with the types of social conduits, the diversity of land use and the degree of neighbourhood fragmentation.

KW - built environment

KW - community

KW - diversity/cohesion/segregation

KW - land use

KW - neighbourhood

KW - place attachment

KW - social interaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058671964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0042098018780617

DO - 10.1177/0042098018780617

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 226

EP - 248

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 1

ER -