Neighbourhood land use features, collective efficacy and local civic actions

Jonathan Corcoran, Renee Zahnow, Rebecca Wickes, John Hipp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores the association between neighbourhood land use features and informal social control. More specifically, we examine the extent to which such features in combination with the socio-demographic context of the neighbourhood facilitate or impede collective efficacy and local civic actions. We achieve this through spatially integrating data from the census, topographic databases and a 2012 survey of 4132 residents from 148 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia. The study creates a new classification of a neighbourhood’s physical environment by creating novel categories of land use features that depict social conduits, social holes and social wedges. Social conduits are features of the neighbourhood that facilitate interaction between individuals, social holes are land uses that create situations where there is no occupancy, and social wedges are features that carve up neighbourhoods. We find some evidence to suggest that residents’ reports of collective efficacy are higher in neighbourhoods with a greater density of social conduits. Density of social conduits is also positively associated with local civic action. However, in neighbourhoods with more greenspace, residents are less likely to engage in local civic actions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2372-2390
Number of pages19
JournalUrban Studies
Volume55
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Corcoran, Jonathan ; Zahnow, Renee ; Wickes, Rebecca ; Hipp, John. / Neighbourhood land use features, collective efficacy and local civic actions. In: Urban Studies. 2018 ; Vol. 55, No. 11. pp. 2372-2390.
@article{f10870427b4345e49d9e81f34f2decd4,
title = "Neighbourhood land use features, collective efficacy and local civic actions",
abstract = "This paper explores the association between neighbourhood land use features and informal social control. More specifically, we examine the extent to which such features in combination with the socio-demographic context of the neighbourhood facilitate or impede collective efficacy and local civic actions. We achieve this through spatially integrating data from the census, topographic databases and a 2012 survey of 4132 residents from 148 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia. The study creates a new classification of a neighbourhood’s physical environment by creating novel categories of land use features that depict social conduits, social holes and social wedges. Social conduits are features of the neighbourhood that facilitate interaction between individuals, social holes are land uses that create situations where there is no occupancy, and social wedges are features that carve up neighbourhoods. We find some evidence to suggest that residents’ reports of collective efficacy are higher in neighbourhoods with a greater density of social conduits. Density of social conduits is also positively associated with local civic action. However, in neighbourhoods with more greenspace, residents are less likely to engage in local civic actions.",
author = "Jonathan Corcoran and Renee Zahnow and Rebecca Wickes and John Hipp",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0042098017717212",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "2372--2390",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "11",

}

Neighbourhood land use features, collective efficacy and local civic actions. / Corcoran, Jonathan; Zahnow, Renee; Wickes, Rebecca; Hipp, John.

In: Urban Studies, Vol. 55, No. 11, 01.08.2018, p. 2372-2390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neighbourhood land use features, collective efficacy and local civic actions

AU - Corcoran, Jonathan

AU - Zahnow, Renee

AU - Wickes, Rebecca

AU - Hipp, John

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - This paper explores the association between neighbourhood land use features and informal social control. More specifically, we examine the extent to which such features in combination with the socio-demographic context of the neighbourhood facilitate or impede collective efficacy and local civic actions. We achieve this through spatially integrating data from the census, topographic databases and a 2012 survey of 4132 residents from 148 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia. The study creates a new classification of a neighbourhood’s physical environment by creating novel categories of land use features that depict social conduits, social holes and social wedges. Social conduits are features of the neighbourhood that facilitate interaction between individuals, social holes are land uses that create situations where there is no occupancy, and social wedges are features that carve up neighbourhoods. We find some evidence to suggest that residents’ reports of collective efficacy are higher in neighbourhoods with a greater density of social conduits. Density of social conduits is also positively associated with local civic action. However, in neighbourhoods with more greenspace, residents are less likely to engage in local civic actions.

AB - This paper explores the association between neighbourhood land use features and informal social control. More specifically, we examine the extent to which such features in combination with the socio-demographic context of the neighbourhood facilitate or impede collective efficacy and local civic actions. We achieve this through spatially integrating data from the census, topographic databases and a 2012 survey of 4132 residents from 148 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia. The study creates a new classification of a neighbourhood’s physical environment by creating novel categories of land use features that depict social conduits, social holes and social wedges. Social conduits are features of the neighbourhood that facilitate interaction between individuals, social holes are land uses that create situations where there is no occupancy, and social wedges are features that carve up neighbourhoods. We find some evidence to suggest that residents’ reports of collective efficacy are higher in neighbourhoods with a greater density of social conduits. Density of social conduits is also positively associated with local civic action. However, in neighbourhoods with more greenspace, residents are less likely to engage in local civic actions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043382791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0042098017717212

DO - 10.1177/0042098017717212

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 2372

EP - 2390

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 11

ER -