Near-to-patient-testing to inform targeted antibiotic use for sexually transmitted infections in a public sexual health clinic: the NEPTUNE cohort study

Lenka A. Vodstrcil, Kay Htaik, Erica L. Plummer, Vesna De Petra, Melodi G. Sen, Deborah A. Williamson, Jason J. Ong, Jason Wu, Monica Owlad, Gerald Murray, Eric P.F. Chow, Christopher K. Fairley, Catriona S. Bradshaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Empiric treatment of sexually transmitted infections can cause unnecessary antibiotic use. We determined if near-to-patient-testing (NPT) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) improved antibiotic-use for a range of clinical presentations. Methods: Clients attending with non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU), proctitis, as STI-contacts, or for an MG-test-of-cure (MG-TOC) between March and December 2021 were recruited. Participants received near-to-patient-testing (NPT-group) for the three STIs using the GeneXpert® System (Cepheid), and concurrent routine-testing by transcription-mediated-amplification (TMA; Aptima, Hologic). Antibiotic-use among NGU or proctitis cases in the NPT-group was compared to clinic-controls undergoing routine-testing only. The proportion in the NPT-group who notified partners <24 hrs of their STI-specific result was calculated. Findings: Among 904 consults by 808 NPT-participants, ≥1 STI was detected in 63/252 (25.0%) with NGU, 22/51 (43.1%) with proctitis, and 167/527 (31.7%) STI-contacts. MG was detected among 35/157 (22.3%) MG-TOC consults. Among NGU and proctitis cases, fewer in the NPT-group received empiric treatment compared to clinic-controls (29.4% [95% CI: 24.3–34.9%] vs 83.8% [95% CI: 79.2–87.8%], p < 0.001), resulting in more NPT-group cases appropriately treated (STI-specific drug/no drug appropriately; 80.9% [95% CI: 76.0–85.1%] vs 33.0% [95% CI: 27.7–38.6%], p < 0.001) and fewer mistreated (incorrect drug/treated but pathogen-negative; 17.8% [13.7–22.6%] vs 61.4% [55.6–66.9%], p < 0.001). Of 167/264 in the NPT-group with an STI who responded regarding partner-notification, 95.2% notified all/some partners; 85.9% notified them <24 hrs of the STI-specific result. Interpretation: Near-to-patient-testing significantly improved antibiotic use and a high proportion of individuals rapidly notified partners of STI-specific results, highlighting the broad benefits of timely diagnostic strategies for STIs in clinical decision making and partner notification. Funding: ARC ITRP Hub-grant; NHMRC.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101005
Number of pages15
JournalThe Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Volume44
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial stewardship
  • Chlamydia trachomatis
  • Empiric treatment
  • Mycoplasma genitalium
  • Near to patient testing
  • Neisseria gonorrhoeae
  • Point of care testing
  • Sexually transmitted infections
  • Syndromic management

Cite this