TY - JOUR
T1 - Navigating challenging digital literacy practices
T2 - the settlement experiences of adults from migrant and refugee backgrounds
AU - Tour, Ekaterina
AU - Creely, Edwin
AU - Waterhouse, Peter
AU - Pham, Xuan
AU - Henderson, Michael
AU - Wallace, Mary
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by The Australian Government Department of Home Affairs.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Digital literacies are critical for adults from migrant and refugee backgrounds as they settle in a new country. However, institutions, leaders, and teachers often feel uncertain about how to teach digital literacies. Using the notions of digital literacy practices and assemblages, this article reports on a qualitative case study and explores how 30 adults from migrant and refugee backgrounds navigated challenging digital literacy practices related to settlement in Australia. This research found that to deal with challenges, the participants brought together different personal, social, material, symbolic, temporal, and spatial resources. However, sometimes the required resources were not available, which constrained the participants’ practices. Some participants were aware of the need to find new solutions but they often did not know how this might be done. In contrast, some participants were reluctant to take a risk. The article concludes with implications for EAL practice by suggesting strengths-based pedagogies for digital literacies.
AB - Digital literacies are critical for adults from migrant and refugee backgrounds as they settle in a new country. However, institutions, leaders, and teachers often feel uncertain about how to teach digital literacies. Using the notions of digital literacy practices and assemblages, this article reports on a qualitative case study and explores how 30 adults from migrant and refugee backgrounds navigated challenging digital literacy practices related to settlement in Australia. This research found that to deal with challenges, the participants brought together different personal, social, material, symbolic, temporal, and spatial resources. However, sometimes the required resources were not available, which constrained the participants’ practices. Some participants were aware of the need to find new solutions but they often did not know how this might be done. In contrast, some participants were reluctant to take a risk. The article concludes with implications for EAL practice by suggesting strengths-based pedagogies for digital literacies.
KW - adult learners
KW - agency
KW - assemblages
KW - digital literacies
KW - English as an Additional Language (EAL)
KW - migrants and refugees
KW - settlement
KW - strengths-based pedagogy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162636777&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/07417136231180867
DO - 10.1177/07417136231180867
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85162636777
SN - 0741-7136
VL - 73
SP - 422
EP - 441
JO - Adult Education Quarterly
JF - Adult Education Quarterly
IS - 4
ER -