TY - JOUR
T1 - Narrative research in climate change adaptation - Exploring a complementary paradigm for research and governance
AU - Paschen, Jana Axinja
AU - Ison, Ray
N1 - Funding Information:
Our research on local narratives and adaptation governance is part of a larger research collaboration on ‘Framing multi-level and multi-actor responses to adaptation’, funded by the state government of Victoria, Australia , through the Victorian Centre for Climate Change Adaptation Research (VCCCAR). VCCCAR brings together researchers from four Victorian universities with state and local governments to assist collaborative advances in climate change adaptation research. The authors would like to thank members of the VCCCAR project team, Hartmut Fünfgeld, Phil Wallis, Rod Keenan, Ben Iaquinto and Darryn McEvoy, for their valuable comments on early versions of this paper. In particular, we thank Elissa Waters for contributing a policy perspective to the arguments brought forward in this paper.
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Climate adaptation research increasingly focuses on the socio-cultural dimensions of change. In this context, narrative research is often seen as a qualitative social science method used to frame adaptation communication. However, this perspective neglects an important insight provided by narrative theory as applied in the cognitive sciences and other practical fields: human cognition is organized around specific narrative structures. In adaptation, this means that how we 'story' the environment determines how we understand and practice adaptation, how risks are defined, who is authorized as actors in the change debate, and the range of policy options considered. Furthermore, relating an experience through story-telling is already doing 'knowledge work', or learning. In taking narrative beyond its use as an extractive social research methodology, we argue that narrative research offers an innovative, holistic approach to a better understanding of socio-ecological systems and the improved, participatory design of local adaptation policies. Beyond producing data on local knowledge(s) and socio-cultural and affective-emotive factors influencing adaptive capacity, it can significantly inform public engagement, deliberation and learning strategies-features of systemic adaptive governance. We critically discuss narrative as both a self-reflective methodology and as a paradigmatic shift in future adaptation research and practice. We explore the narrative approach as a basis for participatory learning in the governance of socio-ecological systems. Finally, we assemble arguments for investing in alternative governance approaches consistent with a shift to a 'narrative paradigm'.
AB - Climate adaptation research increasingly focuses on the socio-cultural dimensions of change. In this context, narrative research is often seen as a qualitative social science method used to frame adaptation communication. However, this perspective neglects an important insight provided by narrative theory as applied in the cognitive sciences and other practical fields: human cognition is organized around specific narrative structures. In adaptation, this means that how we 'story' the environment determines how we understand and practice adaptation, how risks are defined, who is authorized as actors in the change debate, and the range of policy options considered. Furthermore, relating an experience through story-telling is already doing 'knowledge work', or learning. In taking narrative beyond its use as an extractive social research methodology, we argue that narrative research offers an innovative, holistic approach to a better understanding of socio-ecological systems and the improved, participatory design of local adaptation policies. Beyond producing data on local knowledge(s) and socio-cultural and affective-emotive factors influencing adaptive capacity, it can significantly inform public engagement, deliberation and learning strategies-features of systemic adaptive governance. We critically discuss narrative as both a self-reflective methodology and as a paradigmatic shift in future adaptation research and practice. We explore the narrative approach as a basis for participatory learning in the governance of socio-ecological systems. Finally, we assemble arguments for investing in alternative governance approaches consistent with a shift to a 'narrative paradigm'.
KW - Adaptation
KW - Knowledge production
KW - Narrative
KW - Participatory governance
KW - Socio-ecological systems
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84899911747
U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.006
DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.006
M3 - Article
SN - 0048-7333
VL - 43
SP - 1083
EP - 1092
JO - Research Policy
JF - Research Policy
IS - 6
ER -