TY - JOUR
T1 - Napabucasin versus placebo in refractory advanced colorectal cancer
T2 - a randomised phase 3 trial
AU - Jonker, Derek J.
AU - Nott, Louise
AU - Yoshino, Takayuki
AU - Gill, Sharlene
AU - Shapiro, Jeremy
AU - Ohtsu, Atsushi
AU - Zalcberg, John
AU - Vickers, Michael M.
AU - Wei, Alice C.
AU - Gao, Yuan
AU - Tebbutt, Niall C.
AU - Markman, Ben
AU - Price, Timothy
AU - Esaki, Taito
AU - Koski, Sheryl
AU - Hitron, Matthew
AU - Li, Wei
AU - Li, Youzhi
AU - Magoski, Nadine M.
AU - Li, Chiang J.
AU - Simes, John
AU - Tu, Dongsheng
AU - O'Callaghan, Christopher J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this study was supported by the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute and Boston Biomedical. A list of additional participating investigators is available in the appendix .
Funding Information:
WL and MH are employees of, and hold intellectual property with, Boston Biomedical. YL and YG were employees at the time of the study of, and have intellectual property with, Boston Biomedical and are current employees of 1Globe Health Institute. CJL was an employee of Boston Biomedical at the time of the study and is an employee of and holds patents with 1Globe Health Institute. TP reports non-financial support from Roche and Merck and grants from Amgen. SG has received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Taiho Pharmaceuticals. JSh has received travel, accommodation, or other expenses from Amgen and Merck. TY has received grants from GlaxoSmithKline KK and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim and honoraria from Taiho, Chugai, and Eli Lilly. AO reports grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb. JZ has received personal fees from Bayer, Roche, Amgen, Pfizer, Specialized Therapeutics, and Merck Serono, travel support from Merck Serono and Ipsen, and grants from Bayer, Roche, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Shire. NCT has received honoraria from Merck Serono, Amgen, and Roche. ACW has received honoraria from Sanofi, Celgene, and Shire. SK has received honoraria from Celgene. MMV has had advisory roles with Ipsen, Celgene, and Amgen. TE has received honoraria from Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Merck Serono, Ono Pharmaceutical, Nihon Kayahu, and Eisai and institutional funding from Eli Lilly, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Merck Serono, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline. JSi, DJJ, DT, NMM, CJO'C, LN, and BM declare no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Background: Napabucasin is a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that targets STAT3, which is a poor prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. This study aimed to test napabucasin in advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: This study was a double-blind randomised phase 3 trial done at 68 centres in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer with a good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0–1) for whom all available standard therapies had failed were eligible for the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive placebo or napabucasin through a web-based system with a permuted block method, after stratification by ECOG performance status, KRAS status, previous VEGF inhibitor treatment, and time from diagnosis of metastatic disease. Napabucasin 480 mg or matching placebo was taken orally every 12 h. All patients received best supportive care. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed in an intention-to-treat analysis. This is the final analysis of this trial, which is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01830621. Findings: Accrual began on April 15, 2013, and was stopped for futility on May 23, 2014, at which point 282 patients had undergone randomisation (138 assigned to the napabucasin group and 144 to the placebo group). Overall survival did not differ significantly between groups: median overall survival was 4·4 months (95% CI 3·7–4·9) in the napabucasin group and 4·8 months (4·0–5·3) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·13, 95% CI 0·88–1·46, p=0·34). The safety population included 136 patients in the napabucasin group and 144 patients in the placebo group. More patients who received napabucasin had any grade of treatment-related diarrhoea (108 [79%] of 136 patients), nausea (69 [51%]), and anorexia (52 [38%]) than did patients who received placebo (28 [19%] of 144 patients, 35 [24%], and 23 [16%], respectively). The most common severe (grade 3 or worse) treatment-related adverse events were abdominal pain (five [4%] patients receiving napabucasin vs five [3%] receiving placebo), diarrhoea (21 [15%] vs one [1%]), fatigue (14 [10%] vs eight [6%]), and dehydration (six [4%] vs one [1%]). 251 (89%) patients had data on pSTAT3 expression, of whom 55 (22%) had pSTAT3-positive tumours (29 in the napabucasin group, 26 in the placebo group). In a prespecified biomarker analysis of pSTAT3-positive patients, overall survival was longer in the napabucasin group than in the placebo group (median 5·1 months [95% CI 4·0–7·5] vs 3·0 months [1·7–4·1]; HR 0·41, 0·23–0·73, p=0·0025). Interpretation: Although there was no difference in overall survival between groups in the overall unselected population, STAT3 might be an important target for the treatment of colorectal cancer with elevated pSTAT3 expression. Nevertheless, these results require validation. Funding: Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute and Boston Biomedical.
AB - Background: Napabucasin is a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that targets STAT3, which is a poor prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. This study aimed to test napabucasin in advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: This study was a double-blind randomised phase 3 trial done at 68 centres in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer with a good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0–1) for whom all available standard therapies had failed were eligible for the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive placebo or napabucasin through a web-based system with a permuted block method, after stratification by ECOG performance status, KRAS status, previous VEGF inhibitor treatment, and time from diagnosis of metastatic disease. Napabucasin 480 mg or matching placebo was taken orally every 12 h. All patients received best supportive care. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed in an intention-to-treat analysis. This is the final analysis of this trial, which is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01830621. Findings: Accrual began on April 15, 2013, and was stopped for futility on May 23, 2014, at which point 282 patients had undergone randomisation (138 assigned to the napabucasin group and 144 to the placebo group). Overall survival did not differ significantly between groups: median overall survival was 4·4 months (95% CI 3·7–4·9) in the napabucasin group and 4·8 months (4·0–5·3) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·13, 95% CI 0·88–1·46, p=0·34). The safety population included 136 patients in the napabucasin group and 144 patients in the placebo group. More patients who received napabucasin had any grade of treatment-related diarrhoea (108 [79%] of 136 patients), nausea (69 [51%]), and anorexia (52 [38%]) than did patients who received placebo (28 [19%] of 144 patients, 35 [24%], and 23 [16%], respectively). The most common severe (grade 3 or worse) treatment-related adverse events were abdominal pain (five [4%] patients receiving napabucasin vs five [3%] receiving placebo), diarrhoea (21 [15%] vs one [1%]), fatigue (14 [10%] vs eight [6%]), and dehydration (six [4%] vs one [1%]). 251 (89%) patients had data on pSTAT3 expression, of whom 55 (22%) had pSTAT3-positive tumours (29 in the napabucasin group, 26 in the placebo group). In a prespecified biomarker analysis of pSTAT3-positive patients, overall survival was longer in the napabucasin group than in the placebo group (median 5·1 months [95% CI 4·0–7·5] vs 3·0 months [1·7–4·1]; HR 0·41, 0·23–0·73, p=0·0025). Interpretation: Although there was no difference in overall survival between groups in the overall unselected population, STAT3 might be an important target for the treatment of colorectal cancer with elevated pSTAT3 expression. Nevertheless, these results require validation. Funding: Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute and Boston Biomedical.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042878227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30009-8
DO - 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30009-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 29397354
AN - SCOPUS:85042878227
SN - 2468-1253
VL - 3
SP - 263
EP - 270
JO - The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
JF - The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
IS - 4
ER -