Abstract
The use of eponyms is controversial. A distinction must be made between those doctors and scientists
after whom disorders and syndromes are named in honour of their discoveries, and those whose discoveries
were made as a result of maltreatment of defenceless prisoners, utilizing specimens from victims of
Nazi extermination policies, and euthanasia victims of racial policies. The second group of scientists
should have their names expunged from the historical record, and their deeds brought to the attention
of their colleagues. We are not however advocating the abolition of eponyms in general, only tainted ones.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 642 - 644 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Neuroscience |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |