TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Following Cessation of Fingolimod
AU - Malpas, Charles B.
AU - Roos, Izanne
AU - Sharmin, Sifat
AU - Buzzard, Katherine
AU - Skibina, Olga
AU - Butzkueven, Helmut
AU - Kappos, Ludwig
AU - Patti, Francesco
AU - Alroughani, Raed
AU - Horakova, Dana
AU - Havrdova, Eva Kubala
AU - Izquierdo, Guillermo
AU - Eichau, Sara
AU - Hodgkinson, Suzanne
AU - Grammond, Pierre
AU - Lechner-Scott, Jeannette
AU - Kalincik, Tomas
AU - on behalf of the MSBase Study Group
N1 - Funding Information:
Charles Malpas, Sifat Sharmin, Olga Skibina and Sara Eichau report no conflicts of interest. Izanne Roos received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Merck and Sanofi-Genzyme and has received research support from MSIF, ARSEP and the University of Melbourne. Katherine Buzzard received honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, Teva, Novartis, Genzyme-Sanofi, Roche, Merck, CSL and Grifols. Helmut Butzkueven served on scientific advisory boards for Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis and has received conference travel support from Novartis, Biogen and Sanofi Aventis. He serves on steering committees for trials conducted by Biogen and Novartis, and has received research support from Merck, Novartis and Biogen. Ludwig Kappos received research support from Acorda, Actelion, Allozyne, BaroFold, Bayer HealthCare, Bayer Schering, Bayhill Therapeutics, Biogen, Elan, European Union, Genmab, Gianni Rubatto Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, MediciNova, Merck , Novartis, Novartis Research Foundation, Roche, Roche Research Foundation, Sanofi-Aventis, Santhera, Swiss MS Society, Swiss National Research Foundation, Teva Neuroscience, UCB and Wyeth. Francesco Patti received speaker honoraria or advisory board fees from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Myalin, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and TEVA. He received research funding from Ministero Italiano della Universit‡ e della Ricerca Scientifica, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, Biogen and Merck. Raed Alroughani received honoraria as a speaker and for serving on scientific advisory boards from Bayer, Biogen, GSK, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme. Dana Horakova received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, Merck, Teva, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and Novartis, as well as support for research activities from Biogen and the Czech Ministry of Education (project Progres Q27/LF1). Eva Kubala Havrdova received speaker honoraria and consultant fees from Actelion, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Teva, and support for research activities from the Czech Ministry of Education (project Progres Q27/LF1). Guillermo Izquierdo received speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, Roche, Almirall and Teva. Suzanne Hodgkinson received honoraria and consulting fees from Novartis, Bayer Schering and Sanofi, and travel grants from Novartis, Biogen Idec and Bayer Schering. Pierre Grammond is a Merck, Novartis, Teva-neuroscience, Biogen and Genzyme advisory board member, a consultant for Merck, received payments for lectures by Merck, Teva-Neuroscience and Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Society, and received grants for travel from Teva-Neuroscience and Novartis. Jeannette Lechner-Scott accepted travel compensation from Novartis, Biogen and Merck. Her institution receives the honoraria for talks and advisory board commitment from Bayer Health Care, Biogen, Genzyme Sanofi, Merck, Novartis and Teva, has been involved in clinical trials with Biogen, Novartis and Teva. Tomas Kalincik served on scientific advisory boards for Roche, Celgene, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Merck and Biogen, served on a steering committee for Brain Atrophy Initiative by Sanofi-Genzyme, received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from WebMD Global, Novartis, Biogen, Genzyme-Sanofi, Teva, BioCSL and Merck and received research support from Biogen.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Background: There is growing interest in the issue of disease reactivation in multiple sclerosis following fingolimod cessation. Relatively little is known about modifiers of the risk of post-cessation relapse, including the delay to commencement of new therapy and prior disease activity. Objective: We aimed to determine the rate of relapse following cessation of fingolimod and to identify predictors of relapse following cessation. Methods: Data were extracted from the MSBase registry in March 2019. Inclusion criteria were (a) clinically definite relapsing multiple sclerosis, (b) treatment with fingolimod for ≥ 12 months, (c) follow-up after cessation for ≥ 12 months, and (d) at least one Expanded Disability Status Scale score recorded in the 12 months before cessation. Results: A total of 685 patients were identified who met criteria. The mean annualised relapse rate was 1.71 (95% CI 1.59, 1.85) in the year prior to fingolimod, 0.50 (95% CI 0.44, 0.55) on fingolimod and 0.43 (95% CI 0.38, 0.49) after fingolimod. Of these, 218 (32%) patients experienced a relapse in the first 12 months. Predictors of a higher relapse rate in the first year were: younger age at fingolimod cessation, higher relapse rate in the year prior to cessation, delaying commencement of new therapy and switching to low-efficacy therapy. Conclusions: Disease reactivation following fingolimod cessation is more common in younger patients, those with greater disease activity prior to cessation and in those who switch to a low-efficacy therapy.
AB - Background: There is growing interest in the issue of disease reactivation in multiple sclerosis following fingolimod cessation. Relatively little is known about modifiers of the risk of post-cessation relapse, including the delay to commencement of new therapy and prior disease activity. Objective: We aimed to determine the rate of relapse following cessation of fingolimod and to identify predictors of relapse following cessation. Methods: Data were extracted from the MSBase registry in March 2019. Inclusion criteria were (a) clinically definite relapsing multiple sclerosis, (b) treatment with fingolimod for ≥ 12 months, (c) follow-up after cessation for ≥ 12 months, and (d) at least one Expanded Disability Status Scale score recorded in the 12 months before cessation. Results: A total of 685 patients were identified who met criteria. The mean annualised relapse rate was 1.71 (95% CI 1.59, 1.85) in the year prior to fingolimod, 0.50 (95% CI 0.44, 0.55) on fingolimod and 0.43 (95% CI 0.38, 0.49) after fingolimod. Of these, 218 (32%) patients experienced a relapse in the first 12 months. Predictors of a higher relapse rate in the first year were: younger age at fingolimod cessation, higher relapse rate in the year prior to cessation, delaying commencement of new therapy and switching to low-efficacy therapy. Conclusions: Disease reactivation following fingolimod cessation is more common in younger patients, those with greater disease activity prior to cessation and in those who switch to a low-efficacy therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127113710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40261-022-01129-7
DO - 10.1007/s40261-022-01129-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 35303292
AN - SCOPUS:85127113710
SN - 1173-2563
VL - 42
SP - 355
EP - 364
JO - Clinical Drug Investigation
JF - Clinical Drug Investigation
IS - 4
ER -