Multiple ontologies of water:

Politics, conflict and implications for governance

Julian S. Yates, Leila M Harris, Nicole J Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We ask what it would mean to take seriously the possibility of multiple water ontologies, and what the implications of this would be for water governance in theory and practice. We contribute to a growing body of literature that is reformulating understanding of human–water relations and refocusing on the fundamental question of what water ‘is’. Interrogating the political–ontological ‘problem space’ of water governance, we explore a series of ontological disjunctures that persist. Rather than seeking to characterize any individual ontology, we focus on the limitations of silencing diverse ontologies, and on the potential of embracing ontological plurality in water governance. Exploring these ideas in relation to examples from the Canadian province of British Columbia, we develop the notion of ontological conjunctures, which is based on networked dialogue among multiple water ontologies and which points to forms of water governance that begin to embrace such a dialogue. We highlight water as siwlkw and the processual concept of En’owkin as examples of this approach, emphasizing the significance of cross-pollinating scholarship across debates on water and multiple ontologies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)797-815
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Canada
  • First Nations
  • Indigenous governance
  • ontological politics
  • ontology
  • water governance

Cite this

@article{4bbb5bd766ba44f482bf47909f3ca600,
title = "Multiple ontologies of water:: Politics, conflict and implications for governance",
abstract = "We ask what it would mean to take seriously the possibility of multiple water ontologies, and what the implications of this would be for water governance in theory and practice. We contribute to a growing body of literature that is reformulating understanding of human–water relations and refocusing on the fundamental question of what water ‘is’. Interrogating the political–ontological ‘problem space’ of water governance, we explore a series of ontological disjunctures that persist. Rather than seeking to characterize any individual ontology, we focus on the limitations of silencing diverse ontologies, and on the potential of embracing ontological plurality in water governance. Exploring these ideas in relation to examples from the Canadian province of British Columbia, we develop the notion of ontological conjunctures, which is based on networked dialogue among multiple water ontologies and which points to forms of water governance that begin to embrace such a dialogue. We highlight water as siwlkw and the processual concept of En’owkin as examples of this approach, emphasizing the significance of cross-pollinating scholarship across debates on water and multiple ontologies.",
keywords = "Canada, First Nations, Indigenous governance, ontological politics, ontology, water governance",
author = "Yates, {Julian S.} and Harris, {Leila M} and Wilson, {Nicole J}",
year = "2017",
doi = "doi.org/10.1177/0263775817700395",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "797--815",
journal = "Environment and Planning D: Society and Space",
issn = "0263-7758",
publisher = "Pion",
number = "5",

}

Multiple ontologies of water: Politics, conflict and implications for governance. / Yates, Julian S.; Harris, Leila M; Wilson, Nicole J.

In: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2017, p. 797-815.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple ontologies of water:

T2 - Politics, conflict and implications for governance

AU - Yates, Julian S.

AU - Harris, Leila M

AU - Wilson, Nicole J

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We ask what it would mean to take seriously the possibility of multiple water ontologies, and what the implications of this would be for water governance in theory and practice. We contribute to a growing body of literature that is reformulating understanding of human–water relations and refocusing on the fundamental question of what water ‘is’. Interrogating the political–ontological ‘problem space’ of water governance, we explore a series of ontological disjunctures that persist. Rather than seeking to characterize any individual ontology, we focus on the limitations of silencing diverse ontologies, and on the potential of embracing ontological plurality in water governance. Exploring these ideas in relation to examples from the Canadian province of British Columbia, we develop the notion of ontological conjunctures, which is based on networked dialogue among multiple water ontologies and which points to forms of water governance that begin to embrace such a dialogue. We highlight water as siwlkw and the processual concept of En’owkin as examples of this approach, emphasizing the significance of cross-pollinating scholarship across debates on water and multiple ontologies.

AB - We ask what it would mean to take seriously the possibility of multiple water ontologies, and what the implications of this would be for water governance in theory and practice. We contribute to a growing body of literature that is reformulating understanding of human–water relations and refocusing on the fundamental question of what water ‘is’. Interrogating the political–ontological ‘problem space’ of water governance, we explore a series of ontological disjunctures that persist. Rather than seeking to characterize any individual ontology, we focus on the limitations of silencing diverse ontologies, and on the potential of embracing ontological plurality in water governance. Exploring these ideas in relation to examples from the Canadian province of British Columbia, we develop the notion of ontological conjunctures, which is based on networked dialogue among multiple water ontologies and which points to forms of water governance that begin to embrace such a dialogue. We highlight water as siwlkw and the processual concept of En’owkin as examples of this approach, emphasizing the significance of cross-pollinating scholarship across debates on water and multiple ontologies.

KW - Canada

KW - First Nations

KW - Indigenous governance

KW - ontological politics

KW - ontology

KW - water governance

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0263775817700395

U2 - doi.org/10.1177/0263775817700395

DO - doi.org/10.1177/0263775817700395

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 797

EP - 815

JO - Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

JF - Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

SN - 0263-7758

IS - 5

ER -