Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference PaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Feedback comments on summative assessment tasks are an important part of students’ learning experience. Recently, researchers have noted that digitally recorded comments can be beneficial for both students and educators. This paper compares the clarity, usefulness and satisfaction of digitally recorded and text-based feedback comments produced by 14 tutors in a large Master’s level Education unit. A sample of 164 students completed the online survey. Initial analysis of the data reveal mixed results. When secondary variables are accounted for and outliers discounted it is revealed that digitally recorded multimodal feedback processes, in general, can be clearer, more useful and more satisfying. However, it is also clear that using technology such as video is not a silicon bullet to improving feedback. Several potential factors are identified and are discussed in terms of micro- and meso-level contextual conditions that need to be further researched.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationShow Me The Learning
EditorsS Barker, S Dawson, A Pardo, C Colvin
PublisherASCILITE
Pages514-522
Number of pages9
Volume33
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventAnnual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education 2016: Show Me The Learning - University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Duration: 28 Nov 201630 Nov 2016
Conference number: 33rd
http://2016conference.ascilite.org/ (Conference website)
http://2016conference.ascilite.org/wp-content/uploads/ASCILITE-2016-full-proceedings-Updated-1512.pdf (Conference Proceedings)

Conference

ConferenceAnnual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education 2016
Abbreviated titleASCILITE 2016
CountryAustralia
CityAdelaide
Period28/11/1630/11/16
Other33rd International Conference of Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education
Internet address

Keywords

  • Multimodal feedback
  • Assessment
  • Feedback
  • Tutor differences
  • Higher Education

Cite this

Phillips, M. D., Henderson, M., & Ryan, T. A. (2016). Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying. In S. Barker, S. Dawson, A. Pardo, & C. Colvin (Eds.), Show Me The Learning (Vol. 33, pp. 514-522). ASCILITE.
Phillips, Michael David ; Henderson, Michael ; Ryan, Tracii Ann. / Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying. Show Me The Learning. editor / S Barker ; S Dawson ; A Pardo ; C Colvin. Vol. 33 ASCILITE, 2016. pp. 514-522
@inproceedings{a0ffbcd4dfa7471ca84271cf44bebb11,
title = "Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying",
abstract = "Feedback comments on summative assessment tasks are an important part of students’ learning experience. Recently, researchers have noted that digitally recorded comments can be beneficial for both students and educators. This paper compares the clarity, usefulness and satisfaction of digitally recorded and text-based feedback comments produced by 14 tutors in a large Master’s level Education unit. A sample of 164 students completed the online survey. Initial analysis of the data reveal mixed results. When secondary variables are accounted for and outliers discounted it is revealed that digitally recorded multimodal feedback processes, in general, can be clearer, more useful and more satisfying. However, it is also clear that using technology such as video is not a silicon bullet to improving feedback. Several potential factors are identified and are discussed in terms of micro- and meso-level contextual conditions that need to be further researched.",
keywords = "Multimodal feedback, Assessment, Feedback, Tutor differences, Higher Education",
author = "Phillips, {Michael David} and Michael Henderson and Ryan, {Tracii Ann}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "514--522",
editor = "S Barker and S Dawson and A Pardo and C Colvin",
booktitle = "Show Me The Learning",
publisher = "ASCILITE",

}

Phillips, MD, Henderson, M & Ryan, TA 2016, Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying. in S Barker, S Dawson, A Pardo & C Colvin (eds), Show Me The Learning. vol. 33, ASCILITE, pp. 514-522, Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education 2016, Adelaide, Australia, 28/11/16.

Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying. / Phillips, Michael David; Henderson, Michael; Ryan, Tracii Ann.

Show Me The Learning. ed. / S Barker; S Dawson; A Pardo; C Colvin. Vol. 33 ASCILITE, 2016. p. 514-522.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference PaperResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying

AU - Phillips, Michael David

AU - Henderson, Michael

AU - Ryan, Tracii Ann

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Feedback comments on summative assessment tasks are an important part of students’ learning experience. Recently, researchers have noted that digitally recorded comments can be beneficial for both students and educators. This paper compares the clarity, usefulness and satisfaction of digitally recorded and text-based feedback comments produced by 14 tutors in a large Master’s level Education unit. A sample of 164 students completed the online survey. Initial analysis of the data reveal mixed results. When secondary variables are accounted for and outliers discounted it is revealed that digitally recorded multimodal feedback processes, in general, can be clearer, more useful and more satisfying. However, it is also clear that using technology such as video is not a silicon bullet to improving feedback. Several potential factors are identified and are discussed in terms of micro- and meso-level contextual conditions that need to be further researched.

AB - Feedback comments on summative assessment tasks are an important part of students’ learning experience. Recently, researchers have noted that digitally recorded comments can be beneficial for both students and educators. This paper compares the clarity, usefulness and satisfaction of digitally recorded and text-based feedback comments produced by 14 tutors in a large Master’s level Education unit. A sample of 164 students completed the online survey. Initial analysis of the data reveal mixed results. When secondary variables are accounted for and outliers discounted it is revealed that digitally recorded multimodal feedback processes, in general, can be clearer, more useful and more satisfying. However, it is also clear that using technology such as video is not a silicon bullet to improving feedback. Several potential factors are identified and are discussed in terms of micro- and meso-level contextual conditions that need to be further researched.

KW - Multimodal feedback

KW - Assessment

KW - Feedback

KW - Tutor differences

KW - Higher Education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063902455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference Paper

VL - 33

SP - 514

EP - 522

BT - Show Me The Learning

A2 - Barker, S

A2 - Dawson, S

A2 - Pardo, A

A2 - Colvin, C

PB - ASCILITE

ER -

Phillips MD, Henderson M, Ryan TA. Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying. In Barker S, Dawson S, Pardo A, Colvin C, editors, Show Me The Learning. Vol. 33. ASCILITE. 2016. p. 514-522