Multihadronic events at Ec.m.=29 GeV and predictions of QCD models from Ec.m.=29 GeV to Ec.m.=93 GeV

A. Petersen; G. Abrams; C. E. Adolphsen; C. Akerlof; J. P. Alexander; M. Alvarez; D. Amidei; A. R. Baden; J. Ballam; B. C. Barish; T. Barklow; B. A. Barnett; J. Bartelt; D. Blockus; G. Bonvicini; A. Boyarski; J. Boyer; B. Brabson; A. Breakstone; J. M. Brom; F. Bulos; P. R. Burchat; D. L. Burke; F. Butler; F. Calvino; R. J. Cence; J. Chapman; D. Cords; D. P. Coupal; H. C. Destaebler; D. E. Dorfan; J. M. Dorfan; P. S. Drell; G. J. Feldman; E. Fernandez; R. C. Field; W. T. Ford; C. Fordham; R. Frey; D. Fujino; K. K. Gan; G. Gidal; L. Gladney; T. Glanzman; M. S. Gold; G. Goldhaber; L. Golding; A. Green; P. Grosse-Wiesmann; J. Haggerty; G. Hanson; R. Harr; F. A. Harris; C. M. Hawkes; K. Hayes; D. Herrup; C. A. Heusch; T. Himel; M. Hoenk; R. J. Hollebeek; D. Hutchinson; J. Hylen; W. R. Innes; M. Jaffre; J. A. Jaros; I. Juricic; J. A. Kadyk; D. Karlen; J. Kent; S. R. Klein; A. Koide; W. Koska; W. Kozanecki; A. J. Lankford; R. R. Larsen; B. W. Leclaire; M. E. Levi; Z. Li; A. M. Litke; N. S. Lockyer; C. Matteuzzi; J. A.J. Matthews; D. I. Meyer; B. D. Milliken; K. C. Moffeit; L. Müller; J. Nash; M. E. Nelson; D. Nitz; H. Ogren; R. A. Ong; K. F. Oshaughnessy; S. I. Parker; C. Peck; M. L. Perl; M. Petradza; F. C. Porter; P. Rankin; B. Richter; K. Riles; P. C. Rowson; D. R. Rust; H. F.W. Sadrozinski; T. Schaad; T. L. Schalk; H. Schellman; W. B. Schmidke; A. S. Schwarz; A. Seiden; P. D. Sheldon; J. G. Smith; A. Snyder; E. Soderstrom; D. P. Stoker; R. Stroynowski; R. Thun; G. H. Trilling; R. Tschirhart; C. De La Vaissiere; R. Van Kooten; H. Veltman; P. Voruganti; S. R. Wagner; P. Weber; A. J. Weinstein; A. Weir; S. Weisz; S. L. White; E. Wicklund; D. R. Wood; D. Y. Wu; J. M. Yelton

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1

Multihadronic events at Ec.m.=29 GeV and predictions of QCD models from Ec.m.=29 GeV to Ec.m.=93 GeV

A. Petersen, G. Abrams, C. E. Adolphsen, C. Akerlof, J. P. Alexander, M. Alvarez, D. Amidei, A. R. Baden, J. Ballam, B. C. Barish, T. Barklow, B. A. Barnett, J. Bartelt, D. Blockus, G. Bonvicini, A. Boyarski, J. Boyer, B. Brabson, A. Breakstone, J. M. BromF. Bulos, P. R. Burchat, D. L. Burke, F. Butler, F. Calvino, R. J. Cence, J. Chapman, D. Cords, D. P. Coupal, H. C. Destaebler, D. E. Dorfan, J. M. Dorfan, P. S. Drell, G. J. Feldman, E. Fernandez, R. C. Field, W. T. Ford, C. Fordham, R. Frey, D. Fujino, K. K. Gan, G. Gidal, L. Gladney, T. Glanzman, M. S. Gold, G. Goldhaber, L. Golding, A. Green, P. Grosse-Wiesmann, J. Haggerty, G. Hanson, R. Harr, F. A. Harris, C. M. Hawkes, K. Hayes, D. Herrup, C. A. Heusch, T. Himel, M. Hoenk, R. J. Hollebeek, D. Hutchinson, J. Hylen, W. R. Innes, M. Jaffre, J. A. Jaros, I. Juricic, J. A. Kadyk, D. Karlen, J. Kent, S. R. Klein, A. Koide, W. Koska, W. Kozanecki, A. J. Lankford, R. R. Larsen, B. W. Leclaire, M. E. Levi, Z. Li, A. M. Litke, N. S. Lockyer, C. Matteuzzi, J. A.J. Matthews, D. I. Meyer, B. D. Milliken, K. C. Moffeit, L. Müller, J. Nash, M. E. Nelson, D. Nitz, H. Ogren, R. A. Ong, K. F. Oshaughnessy, S. I. Parker, C. Peck, M. L. Perl, M. Petradza, F. C. Porter, P. Rankin, B. Richter, K. Riles, P. C. Rowson, D. R. Rust, H. F.W. Sadrozinski, T. Schaad, T. L. Schalk, H. Schellman, W. B. Schmidke, A. S. Schwarz, A. Seiden, P. D. Sheldon, J. G. Smith, A. Snyder, E. Soderstrom, D. P. Stoker, R. Stroynowski, R. Thun, G. H. Trilling, R. Tschirhart, C. De La Vaissiere, R. Van Kooten, H. Veltman, P. Voruganti, S. R. Wagner, P. Weber, A. J. Weinstein, A. Weir, S. Weisz, S. L. White, E. Wicklund, D. R. Wood, D. Y. Wu, J. M. Yelton

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

165 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multihadronic e+e- annihilation events at a center-of-mass energy of 29 GeV have been studied with both the original (PEP 5) Mark II and the upgraded Mark II detectors. Detector-corrected distributions from global shape analyses such as aplanarity, Q2-Q1, sphericity, thrust, minor value, oblateness, and jet masses, and inclusive charged-particle distributions including x, rapidity, p, and particle flow are presented. These distributions are compared with predictions from various multihadron event models which use leading-logarithmic shower evolution or QCD matrix elements at the parton level and string or cluster fragmentation for hadronization. The new generation of parton-shower models gives, on the average, a better description of the data than the previous parton-shower models. The energy behavior of these models is compared to existing e+e- data. The predictions of the models at a center-of-mass energy of 93 GeV, roughly the expected mass of the Z0, are also presented.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-27
Number of pages	27
Journal	Physical Review D
Volume	37
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 1988
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1

Cite this

Petersen, A., Abrams, G., Adolphsen, C. E., Akerlof, C., Alexander, J. P., Alvarez, M., Amidei, D., Baden, A. R., Ballam, J., Barish, B. C., Barklow, T., Barnett, B. A., Bartelt, J., Blockus, D., Bonvicini, G., Boyarski, A., Boyer, J., Brabson, B., Breakstone, A., ... Yelton, J. M. (1988). Multihadronic events at Ec.m.=29 GeV and predictions of QCD models from Ec.m.=29 GeV to Ec.m.=93 GeV. Physical Review D, 37(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1

@article{5d5f75b97c3a4885b2eeb6bef2da0574,

title = "Multihadronic events at Ec.m.=29 GeV and predictions of QCD models from Ec.m.=29 GeV to Ec.m.=93 GeV",

abstract = "Multihadronic e+e- annihilation events at a center-of-mass energy of 29 GeV have been studied with both the original (PEP 5) Mark II and the upgraded Mark II detectors. Detector-corrected distributions from global shape analyses such as aplanarity, Q2-Q1, sphericity, thrust, minor value, oblateness, and jet masses, and inclusive charged-particle distributions including x, rapidity, p, and particle flow are presented. These distributions are compared with predictions from various multihadron event models which use leading-logarithmic shower evolution or QCD matrix elements at the parton level and string or cluster fragmentation for hadronization. The new generation of parton-shower models gives, on the average, a better description of the data than the previous parton-shower models. The energy behavior of these models is compared to existing e+e- data. The predictions of the models at a center-of-mass energy of 93 GeV, roughly the expected mass of the Z0, are also presented.",

author = "A. Petersen and G. Abrams and Adolphsen, \{C. E.\} and C. Akerlof and Alexander, \{J. P.\} and M. Alvarez and D. Amidei and Baden, \{A. R.\} and J. Ballam and Barish, \{B. C.\} and T. Barklow and Barnett, \{B. A.\} and J. Bartelt and D. Blockus and G. Bonvicini and A. Boyarski and J. Boyer and B. Brabson and A. Breakstone and Brom, \{J. M.\} and F. Bulos and Burchat, \{P. R.\} and Burke, \{D. L.\} and F. Butler and F. Calvino and Cence, \{R. J.\} and J. Chapman and D. Cords and Coupal, \{D. P.\} and Destaebler, \{H. C.\} and Dorfan, \{D. E.\} and Dorfan, \{J. M.\} and Drell, \{P. S.\} and Feldman, \{G. J.\} and E. Fernandez and Field, \{R. C.\} and Ford, \{W. T.\} and C. Fordham and R. Frey and D. Fujino and Gan, \{K. K.\} and G. Gidal and L. Gladney and T. Glanzman and Gold, \{M. S.\} and G. Goldhaber and L. Golding and A. Green and P. Grosse-Wiesmann and J. Haggerty and G. Hanson and R. Harr and Harris, \{F. A.\} and Hawkes, \{C. M.\} and K. Hayes and D. Herrup and Heusch, \{C. A.\} and T. Himel and M. Hoenk and Hollebeek, \{R. J.\} and D. Hutchinson and J. Hylen and Innes, \{W. R.\} and M. Jaffre and Jaros, \{J. A.\} and I. Juricic and Kadyk, \{J. A.\} and D. Karlen and J. Kent and Klein, \{S. R.\} and A. Koide and W. Koska and W. Kozanecki and Lankford, \{A. J.\} and Larsen, \{R. R.\} and Leclaire, \{B. W.\} and Levi, \{M. E.\} and Z. Li and Litke, \{A. M.\} and Lockyer, \{N. S.\} and C. Matteuzzi and Matthews, \{J. A.J.\} and Meyer, \{D. I.\} and Milliken, \{B. D.\} and Moffeit, \{K. C.\} and L. M{\"u}ller and J. Nash and Nelson, \{M. E.\} and D. Nitz and H. Ogren and Ong, \{R. A.\} and Oshaughnessy, \{K. F.\} and Parker, \{S. I.\} and C. Peck and Perl, \{M. L.\} and M. Petradza and Porter, \{F. C.\} and P. Rankin and B. Richter and K. Riles and Rowson, \{P. C.\} and Rust, \{D. R.\} and Sadrozinski, \{H. F.W.\} and T. Schaad and Schalk, \{T. L.\} and H. Schellman and Schmidke, \{W. B.\} and Schwarz, \{A. S.\} and A. Seiden and Sheldon, \{P. D.\} and Smith, \{J. G.\} and A. Snyder and E. Soderstrom and Stoker, \{D. P.\} and R. Stroynowski and R. Thun and Trilling, \{G. H.\} and R. Tschirhart and \{De La Vaissiere\}, C. and \{Van Kooten\}, R. and H. Veltman and P. Voruganti and Wagner, \{S. R.\} and P. Weber and Weinstein, \{A. J.\} and A. Weir and S. Weisz and White, \{S. L.\} and E. Wicklund and Wood, \{D. R.\} and Wu, \{D. Y.\} and Yelton, \{J. M.\}",

year = "1988",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1",

language = "English",

volume = "37",

pages = "1--27",

journal = "Physical Review D",

issn = "0556-2821",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "1",

}

Petersen, A, Abrams, G, Adolphsen, CE, Akerlof, C, Alexander, JP, Alvarez, M, Amidei, D, Baden, AR, Ballam, J, Barish, BC, Barklow, T, Barnett, BA, Bartelt, J, Blockus, D, Bonvicini, G, Boyarski, A, Boyer, J, Brabson, B, Breakstone, A, Brom, JM, Bulos, F, Burchat, PR, Burke, DL, Butler, F, Calvino, F, Cence, RJ, Chapman, J, Cords, D, Coupal, DP, Destaebler, HC, Dorfan, DE, Dorfan, JM, Drell, PS, Feldman, GJ, Fernandez, E, Field, RC, Ford, WT, Fordham, C, Frey, R, Fujino, D, Gan, KK, Gidal, G, Gladney, L, Glanzman, T, Gold, MS, Goldhaber, G, Golding, L, Green, A, Grosse-Wiesmann, P, Haggerty, J, Hanson, G, Harr, R, Harris, FA, Hawkes, CM, Hayes, K, Herrup, D, Heusch, CA, Himel, T, Hoenk, M, Hollebeek, RJ, Hutchinson, D, Hylen, J, Innes, WR, Jaffre, M, Jaros, JA, Juricic, I, Kadyk, JA, Karlen, D, Kent, J, Klein, SR, Koide, A, Koska, W, Kozanecki, W, Lankford, AJ, Larsen, RR, Leclaire, BW, Levi, ME, Li, Z, Litke, AM, Lockyer, NS, Matteuzzi, C, Matthews, JAJ, Meyer, DI, Milliken, BD, Moffeit, KC, Müller, L, Nash, J, Nelson, ME, Nitz, D, Ogren, H, Ong, RA, Oshaughnessy, KF, Parker, SI, Peck, C, Perl, ML, Petradza, M, Porter, FC, Rankin, P, Richter, B, Riles, K, Rowson, PC, Rust, DR, Sadrozinski, HFW, Schaad, T, Schalk, TL, Schellman, H, Schmidke, WB, Schwarz, AS, Seiden, A, Sheldon, PD, Smith, JG, Snyder, A, Soderstrom, E, Stoker, DP, Stroynowski, R, Thun, R, Trilling, GH, Tschirhart, R, De La Vaissiere, C, Van Kooten, R, Veltman, H, Voruganti, P, Wagner, SR, Weber, P, Weinstein, AJ, Weir, A, Weisz, S, White, SL, Wicklund, E, Wood, DR, Wu, DY & Yelton, JM 1988, 'Multihadronic events at Ec.m.=29 GeV and predictions of QCD models from Ec.m.=29 GeV to Ec.m.=93 GeV', Physical Review D, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multihadronic events at Ec.m.=29 GeV and predictions of QCD models from Ec.m.=29 GeV to Ec.m.=93 GeV

AU - Petersen, A.

AU - Abrams, G.

AU - Adolphsen, C. E.

AU - Akerlof, C.

AU - Alexander, J. P.

AU - Alvarez, M.

AU - Amidei, D.

AU - Baden, A. R.

AU - Ballam, J.

AU - Barish, B. C.

AU - Barklow, T.

AU - Barnett, B. A.

AU - Bartelt, J.

AU - Blockus, D.

AU - Bonvicini, G.

AU - Boyarski, A.

AU - Boyer, J.

AU - Brabson, B.

AU - Breakstone, A.

AU - Brom, J. M.

AU - Bulos, F.

AU - Burchat, P. R.

AU - Burke, D. L.

AU - Butler, F.

AU - Calvino, F.

AU - Cence, R. J.

AU - Chapman, J.

AU - Cords, D.

AU - Coupal, D. P.

AU - Destaebler, H. C.

AU - Dorfan, D. E.

AU - Dorfan, J. M.

AU - Drell, P. S.

AU - Feldman, G. J.

AU - Fernandez, E.

AU - Field, R. C.

AU - Ford, W. T.

AU - Fordham, C.

AU - Frey, R.

AU - Fujino, D.

AU - Gan, K. K.

AU - Gidal, G.

AU - Gladney, L.

AU - Glanzman, T.

AU - Gold, M. S.

AU - Goldhaber, G.

AU - Golding, L.

AU - Green, A.

AU - Grosse-Wiesmann, P.

AU - Haggerty, J.

AU - Hanson, G.

AU - Harr, R.

AU - Harris, F. A.

AU - Hawkes, C. M.

AU - Hayes, K.

AU - Herrup, D.

AU - Heusch, C. A.

AU - Himel, T.

AU - Hoenk, M.

AU - Hollebeek, R. J.

AU - Hutchinson, D.

AU - Hylen, J.

AU - Innes, W. R.

AU - Jaffre, M.

AU - Jaros, J. A.

AU - Juricic, I.

AU - Kadyk, J. A.

AU - Karlen, D.

AU - Kent, J.

AU - Klein, S. R.

AU - Koide, A.

AU - Koska, W.

AU - Kozanecki, W.

AU - Lankford, A. J.

AU - Larsen, R. R.

AU - Leclaire, B. W.

AU - Levi, M. E.

AU - Li, Z.

AU - Litke, A. M.

AU - Lockyer, N. S.

AU - Matteuzzi, C.

AU - Matthews, J. A.J.

AU - Meyer, D. I.

AU - Milliken, B. D.

AU - Moffeit, K. C.

AU - Müller, L.

AU - Nash, J.

AU - Nelson, M. E.

AU - Nitz, D.

AU - Ogren, H.

AU - Ong, R. A.

AU - Oshaughnessy, K. F.

AU - Parker, S. I.

AU - Peck, C.

AU - Perl, M. L.

AU - Petradza, M.

AU - Porter, F. C.

AU - Rankin, P.

AU - Richter, B.

AU - Riles, K.

AU - Rowson, P. C.

AU - Rust, D. R.

AU - Sadrozinski, H. F.W.

AU - Schaad, T.

AU - Schalk, T. L.

AU - Schellman, H.

AU - Schmidke, W. B.

AU - Schwarz, A. S.

AU - Seiden, A.

AU - Sheldon, P. D.

AU - Smith, J. G.

AU - Snyder, A.

AU - Soderstrom, E.

AU - Stoker, D. P.

AU - Stroynowski, R.

AU - Thun, R.

AU - Trilling, G. H.

AU - Tschirhart, R.

AU - De La Vaissiere, C.

AU - Van Kooten, R.

AU - Veltman, H.

AU - Voruganti, P.

AU - Wagner, S. R.

AU - Weber, P.

AU - Weinstein, A. J.

AU - Weir, A.

AU - Weisz, S.

AU - White, S. L.

AU - Wicklund, E.

AU - Wood, D. R.

AU - Wu, D. Y.

AU - Yelton, J. M.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - Multihadronic e+e- annihilation events at a center-of-mass energy of 29 GeV have been studied with both the original (PEP 5) Mark II and the upgraded Mark II detectors. Detector-corrected distributions from global shape analyses such as aplanarity, Q2-Q1, sphericity, thrust, minor value, oblateness, and jet masses, and inclusive charged-particle distributions including x, rapidity, p, and particle flow are presented. These distributions are compared with predictions from various multihadron event models which use leading-logarithmic shower evolution or QCD matrix elements at the parton level and string or cluster fragmentation for hadronization. The new generation of parton-shower models gives, on the average, a better description of the data than the previous parton-shower models. The energy behavior of these models is compared to existing e+e- data. The predictions of the models at a center-of-mass energy of 93 GeV, roughly the expected mass of the Z0, are also presented.

AB - Multihadronic e+e- annihilation events at a center-of-mass energy of 29 GeV have been studied with both the original (PEP 5) Mark II and the upgraded Mark II detectors. Detector-corrected distributions from global shape analyses such as aplanarity, Q2-Q1, sphericity, thrust, minor value, oblateness, and jet masses, and inclusive charged-particle distributions including x, rapidity, p, and particle flow are presented. These distributions are compared with predictions from various multihadron event models which use leading-logarithmic shower evolution or QCD matrix elements at the parton level and string or cluster fragmentation for hadronization. The new generation of parton-shower models gives, on the average, a better description of the data than the previous parton-shower models. The energy behavior of these models is compared to existing e+e- data. The predictions of the models at a center-of-mass energy of 93 GeV, roughly the expected mass of the Z0, are also presented.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0002029739

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002029739

SN - 0556-2821

VL - 37

SP - 1

EP - 27

JO - Physical Review D

JF - Physical Review D

IS - 1

ER -

Multihadronic events at Ec.m.=29 GeV and predictions of QCD models from Ec.m.=29 GeV to Ec.m.=93 GeV

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this