More of the same? A dual case study approach to examining change momentum in the public sector

Laura Barker, Tui Mckeown, Julie Wolfram Cox, Melanie Bryant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Despite the significant amount of change experienced by the public sector, there has been relatively limited empirical examination of how change agendas affect public sector employees in Australia. This article presents a comparative analysis of two Australian public sector organisations that implemented the same positive work change agenda, but experienced very different outcomes. Using a critical realist approach, we draw on a mix of qualitative techniques to suggest that textbook notions of 'successful change', which are often derived from large private sector expectations, may fail to capture the complex nature of how public sector change initiatives may unfold. In particular, we demonstrate how political, temporal, contextual, and process factors interact to shift change momentum. Illustrative examples are provided throughout and the findings are discussed in terms of their implications for theory building, for change facilitation, and for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-271
Number of pages19
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Keywords

  • Critical realism
  • Organisational change
  • Qualitative research

Cite this

@article{1766a1df57ca4d75a1b06e2c0dd674b7,
title = "More of the same? A dual case study approach to examining change momentum in the public sector",
abstract = "Despite the significant amount of change experienced by the public sector, there has been relatively limited empirical examination of how change agendas affect public sector employees in Australia. This article presents a comparative analysis of two Australian public sector organisations that implemented the same positive work change agenda, but experienced very different outcomes. Using a critical realist approach, we draw on a mix of qualitative techniques to suggest that textbook notions of 'successful change', which are often derived from large private sector expectations, may fail to capture the complex nature of how public sector change initiatives may unfold. In particular, we demonstrate how political, temporal, contextual, and process factors interact to shift change momentum. Illustrative examples are provided throughout and the findings are discussed in terms of their implications for theory building, for change facilitation, and for future research.",
keywords = "Critical realism, Organisational change, Qualitative research",
author = "Laura Barker and Tui Mckeown and {Wolfram Cox}, Julie and Melanie Bryant",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8500.12306",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "253--271",
journal = "Australian Journal of Public Administration",
issn = "0313-6647",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

More of the same? A dual case study approach to examining change momentum in the public sector. / Barker, Laura; Mckeown, Tui; Wolfram Cox, Julie; Bryant, Melanie.

In: Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 77, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 253-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - More of the same? A dual case study approach to examining change momentum in the public sector

AU - Barker, Laura

AU - Mckeown, Tui

AU - Wolfram Cox, Julie

AU - Bryant, Melanie

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Despite the significant amount of change experienced by the public sector, there has been relatively limited empirical examination of how change agendas affect public sector employees in Australia. This article presents a comparative analysis of two Australian public sector organisations that implemented the same positive work change agenda, but experienced very different outcomes. Using a critical realist approach, we draw on a mix of qualitative techniques to suggest that textbook notions of 'successful change', which are often derived from large private sector expectations, may fail to capture the complex nature of how public sector change initiatives may unfold. In particular, we demonstrate how political, temporal, contextual, and process factors interact to shift change momentum. Illustrative examples are provided throughout and the findings are discussed in terms of their implications for theory building, for change facilitation, and for future research.

AB - Despite the significant amount of change experienced by the public sector, there has been relatively limited empirical examination of how change agendas affect public sector employees in Australia. This article presents a comparative analysis of two Australian public sector organisations that implemented the same positive work change agenda, but experienced very different outcomes. Using a critical realist approach, we draw on a mix of qualitative techniques to suggest that textbook notions of 'successful change', which are often derived from large private sector expectations, may fail to capture the complex nature of how public sector change initiatives may unfold. In particular, we demonstrate how political, temporal, contextual, and process factors interact to shift change momentum. Illustrative examples are provided throughout and the findings are discussed in terms of their implications for theory building, for change facilitation, and for future research.

KW - Critical realism

KW - Organisational change

KW - Qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040656231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8500.12306

DO - 10.1111/1467-8500.12306

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 253

EP - 271

JO - Australian Journal of Public Administration

JF - Australian Journal of Public Administration

SN - 0313-6647

IS - 2

ER -