TY - JOUR
T1 - Modified positioning of a smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram device improves detection of atrial flutter
AU - Rajakariar, Kevin
AU - Koshy, Anoop N.
AU - Sajeev, Jithin K.
AU - Nair, Sachin
AU - Roberts, Louise
AU - Teh, Andrew W.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Introduction: The AliveCor Kardia Mobile (AKM) is a handheld, smartphone based cardiac rhythm monitor that records a lead-I electrocardiogram (ECG). Despite being efficacious for detection of atrial fibrillation (AF), it is unclear whether atrial flutter (AFL) may be misdiagnosed as sinus rhythm due to regular R-R intervals. We hypothesised that generating lead-II tracings through repositioning of the AKM may improve visualisation of flutter waves and clinician diagnosis of AFL compared to traditional lead-I tracings. Materials and methods: A prospective, multi-centre, validation study was conducted comparing standard lead-I AKM positioning with lead-II in AFL. A mixed cohort of lead I tracings from patients in AF and sinus rhythm were also included. Two independent electrophysiologists (EP) analysed all ECGs blinded to the automated device diagnosis. Results: Fifty patients were recruited, 11 in atrial flutter, 14 in atrial fibrillation, and 25 in sinus rhythm. Lead-I AFL sensitivity was 27.3% for both EP's which individually improved to 72.7% and 54.6% in lead-II. AKM appropriately diagnosed lead-I AFL as unclassified in 18.2% of cases, compared to 54.5% in lead-II. Overall clinician agreement (AF, SR and AFL) was modest utilising AFL lead-I (EP1: κ = 0.71, EP2: κ = 0.73, p < 0.001), which improved with lead-II tracings (EP1: κ = 0.87, EP2: κ = 0.83, both p < 0.001). Conclusion: Repositioning of the AKM device improves clinician diagnosis of atrial flutter. A lead-II tracing may be considered in high-risk patients to improve detection of atrial flutter.
AB - Introduction: The AliveCor Kardia Mobile (AKM) is a handheld, smartphone based cardiac rhythm monitor that records a lead-I electrocardiogram (ECG). Despite being efficacious for detection of atrial fibrillation (AF), it is unclear whether atrial flutter (AFL) may be misdiagnosed as sinus rhythm due to regular R-R intervals. We hypothesised that generating lead-II tracings through repositioning of the AKM may improve visualisation of flutter waves and clinician diagnosis of AFL compared to traditional lead-I tracings. Materials and methods: A prospective, multi-centre, validation study was conducted comparing standard lead-I AKM positioning with lead-II in AFL. A mixed cohort of lead I tracings from patients in AF and sinus rhythm were also included. Two independent electrophysiologists (EP) analysed all ECGs blinded to the automated device diagnosis. Results: Fifty patients were recruited, 11 in atrial flutter, 14 in atrial fibrillation, and 25 in sinus rhythm. Lead-I AFL sensitivity was 27.3% for both EP's which individually improved to 72.7% and 54.6% in lead-II. AKM appropriately diagnosed lead-I AFL as unclassified in 18.2% of cases, compared to 54.5% in lead-II. Overall clinician agreement (AF, SR and AFL) was modest utilising AFL lead-I (EP1: κ = 0.71, EP2: κ = 0.73, p < 0.001), which improved with lead-II tracings (EP1: κ = 0.87, EP2: κ = 0.83, both p < 0.001). Conclusion: Repositioning of the AKM device improves clinician diagnosis of atrial flutter. A lead-II tracing may be considered in high-risk patients to improve detection of atrial flutter.
KW - AliveCor
KW - Atrial flutter
KW - Kardia Mobile
KW - Smartphone
KW - Wireless
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050216429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.07.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.07.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 30177334
AN - SCOPUS:85050216429
SN - 0022-0736
VL - 51
SP - 884
EP - 888
JO - Journal of Electrocardiology
JF - Journal of Electrocardiology
IS - 5
ER -