Abstract
In this paper we employ a theoretical framework - a simple macro model augmented with health - that draws guidance from the Keynesian view of business cycles to examine the relative importance of permanent and transitory shocks in explaining variations in health expenditure and output at business cycle horizons for the USA. The variance decomposition analysis of shocks reveals that at business cycle horizons permanent shocks explain the bulk of the variations in output, while transitory shocks explain the bulk of the variations in health expenditures. We undertake a shock decomposition analysis for private health expenditures versus public health expenditures and interestingly find that while transitory shocks are more important for private sector expenditures, permanent shocks dominate public health expenditures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 872-880 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Health Economics |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Business cycles
- Health expenditures
- Permanent and transitory shocks
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver