Abstract
This article attempts to move the heart of any reader whose initial inclination is to share Bradley's evaluation of the subject of modality. It may be too much to hope that such readers will be wholly won over to this article's opinion on this matter, namely, that philosophy departments of a broadly analytical stripe - or at least their graduate schools - would do well to post an inscription resembling that said to have greeted those at the gates of Plato's Academy: 'Let no one who is ignorant of modal logic enter here.' Although one might expect the philosophical interest of modal logic to lie mainly in the area of modal predicate logic, what follows mostly concerns propositional modal logic, which will already provide ample food for thought - even though many issues of interest will for that reason not get discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy |
| Editors | Frank Jackson, Michael Smith |
| Place of Publication | USA |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191577109 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780199234769 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Nov 2007 |
Keywords
- Analytical philosophy
- Contrariety
- Modal construction
- Modal logic
- Modality
- Predicate logic
Research output
- 1 Citations
- 1 Chapter (Book)
-
Modality
Humberstone, L., 2005, The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Jackson, F. & Smith, M. (eds.). 1 ed. New York USA: Oxford University Press, p. 534 - 614 81 p.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (Book) › Research › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver