Abstract
The no-fault principle is one of the pillars of workers' compensation schemes operating in the States, Territories and the Commonwealth in Australia. This article examines the strength of this principle having regard to provisions common to all jurisdictions which disentitle workers where there is evidence of serious and wilful misconduct or self-inflicted injury. It examines the legislative framework of these provisions in detail noting some differences in approach and effect. The article also traces the origins of these provisions and how they have been applied since enacted. We conclude that the no-fault principle remains robust and intact in Australian workers' compensation schemes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 389-406 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Law and Medicine |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Gross misconduct
- No-fault principle
- Self-inflicted injury
- Serious and wilful misconduct
- Workers' compensation schemes
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver