Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales

Paul S. Myles, Daniel B. Myles, Wendy Galagher, Colleen Chew, Neil Macdonald, Alicia Dennis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Several quality of recovery (QoR) health status scales have been developed to quantify the patient's experience after anesthesia and surgery, but to date, it is unclear what constitutes the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). That is, what minimal change in score would indicate a meaningful change in a patient's health status? Methods: The authors enrolled a sequential, unselected cohort of patients recovering from surgery and used three QoR scales (the 9-item QoR score, the 15-item QoR-15, and the 40-item QoR-40) to quantify a patient's recovery after surgery and anesthesia. The authors compared changes in patient QoR scores with a global rating of change questionnaire using an anchor-based method and three distribution-based methods (0.3 SD, standard error of the measurement, and 5% range). The authors then averaged the change estimates to determine the MCID for each QoR scale. Results: The authors enrolled 204 patients at the first postoperative visit, and 199 were available for a second interview; a further 24 patients were available at the third interview. The QoR scores improved significantly between the first two interviews. Triangulation of distribution- and anchor-based methods results in an MCID of 0.92, 8.0, and 6.3 for the QoR score, QoR-15, and QoR-40, respectively. Conclusion: Perioperative interventions that result in a change of 0.9 for the QoR score, 8.0 for the QoR-15, or 6.3 for the QoR-40 signify a clinically important improvement or deterioration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-45
Number of pages7
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume125
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Cite this

Myles, Paul S. ; Myles, Daniel B. ; Galagher, Wendy ; Chew, Colleen ; Macdonald, Neil ; Dennis, Alicia. / Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales. In: Anesthesiology. 2016 ; Vol. 125, No. 1. pp. 39-45.
@article{dcf1ac57e4c347f7a3c7d802ed07b219,
title = "Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales",
abstract = "Background: Several quality of recovery (QoR) health status scales have been developed to quantify the patient's experience after anesthesia and surgery, but to date, it is unclear what constitutes the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). That is, what minimal change in score would indicate a meaningful change in a patient's health status? Methods: The authors enrolled a sequential, unselected cohort of patients recovering from surgery and used three QoR scales (the 9-item QoR score, the 15-item QoR-15, and the 40-item QoR-40) to quantify a patient's recovery after surgery and anesthesia. The authors compared changes in patient QoR scores with a global rating of change questionnaire using an anchor-based method and three distribution-based methods (0.3 SD, standard error of the measurement, and 5{\%} range). The authors then averaged the change estimates to determine the MCID for each QoR scale. Results: The authors enrolled 204 patients at the first postoperative visit, and 199 were available for a second interview; a further 24 patients were available at the third interview. The QoR scores improved significantly between the first two interviews. Triangulation of distribution- and anchor-based methods results in an MCID of 0.92, 8.0, and 6.3 for the QoR score, QoR-15, and QoR-40, respectively. Conclusion: Perioperative interventions that result in a change of 0.9 for the QoR score, 8.0 for the QoR-15, or 6.3 for the QoR-40 signify a clinically important improvement or deterioration.",
author = "Myles, {Paul S.} and Myles, {Daniel B.} and Wendy Galagher and Colleen Chew and Neil Macdonald and Alicia Dennis",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "39--45",
journal = "Anesthesiology",
issn = "0003-3022",
publisher = "American Society of Anesthesiologists",
number = "1",

}

Myles, PS, Myles, DB, Galagher, W, Chew, C, Macdonald, N & Dennis, A 2016, 'Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales' Anesthesiology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158

Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales. / Myles, Paul S.; Myles, Daniel B.; Galagher, Wendy; Chew, Colleen; Macdonald, Neil; Dennis, Alicia.

In: Anesthesiology, Vol. 125, No. 1, 01.07.2016, p. 39-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales

AU - Myles, Paul S.

AU - Myles, Daniel B.

AU - Galagher, Wendy

AU - Chew, Colleen

AU - Macdonald, Neil

AU - Dennis, Alicia

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Background: Several quality of recovery (QoR) health status scales have been developed to quantify the patient's experience after anesthesia and surgery, but to date, it is unclear what constitutes the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). That is, what minimal change in score would indicate a meaningful change in a patient's health status? Methods: The authors enrolled a sequential, unselected cohort of patients recovering from surgery and used three QoR scales (the 9-item QoR score, the 15-item QoR-15, and the 40-item QoR-40) to quantify a patient's recovery after surgery and anesthesia. The authors compared changes in patient QoR scores with a global rating of change questionnaire using an anchor-based method and three distribution-based methods (0.3 SD, standard error of the measurement, and 5% range). The authors then averaged the change estimates to determine the MCID for each QoR scale. Results: The authors enrolled 204 patients at the first postoperative visit, and 199 were available for a second interview; a further 24 patients were available at the third interview. The QoR scores improved significantly between the first two interviews. Triangulation of distribution- and anchor-based methods results in an MCID of 0.92, 8.0, and 6.3 for the QoR score, QoR-15, and QoR-40, respectively. Conclusion: Perioperative interventions that result in a change of 0.9 for the QoR score, 8.0 for the QoR-15, or 6.3 for the QoR-40 signify a clinically important improvement or deterioration.

AB - Background: Several quality of recovery (QoR) health status scales have been developed to quantify the patient's experience after anesthesia and surgery, but to date, it is unclear what constitutes the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). That is, what minimal change in score would indicate a meaningful change in a patient's health status? Methods: The authors enrolled a sequential, unselected cohort of patients recovering from surgery and used three QoR scales (the 9-item QoR score, the 15-item QoR-15, and the 40-item QoR-40) to quantify a patient's recovery after surgery and anesthesia. The authors compared changes in patient QoR scores with a global rating of change questionnaire using an anchor-based method and three distribution-based methods (0.3 SD, standard error of the measurement, and 5% range). The authors then averaged the change estimates to determine the MCID for each QoR scale. Results: The authors enrolled 204 patients at the first postoperative visit, and 199 were available for a second interview; a further 24 patients were available at the third interview. The QoR scores improved significantly between the first two interviews. Triangulation of distribution- and anchor-based methods results in an MCID of 0.92, 8.0, and 6.3 for the QoR score, QoR-15, and QoR-40, respectively. Conclusion: Perioperative interventions that result in a change of 0.9 for the QoR score, 8.0 for the QoR-15, or 6.3 for the QoR-40 signify a clinically important improvement or deterioration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966351092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158

DO - 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158

M3 - Article

VL - 125

SP - 39

EP - 45

JO - Anesthesiology

JF - Anesthesiology

SN - 0003-3022

IS - 1

ER -