Midwives and clinical investigation

A review of the literature

Catherine R. Alexander, Fiona Bogossian

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: An allegation of negligence or an adverse outcome during childbirth can lead to clinical investigation of a midwife's practice. Anecdotal evidence suggests midwives find this stressful and disturbing. Aim: Synthesise the evidence relating to midwives' experiences of investigation and the effects on clinical practice and personal wellbeing. Methods: Two database searches were conducted between 2015 and 2016 to identify primary research published between 1990 and 2016. Studies were evaluated for quality using standard instruments. Findings: Despite numerous references to 'litigation' in peer-reviewed journals, little substantive research related specifically to midwives. 11 inclusions comprised three qualitative studies (one with two publications), reporting litigation experiences of midwives and seven quantitative studies (four research groups), identifying risk liability through cyclic surveys of midwives and law reports. Failure to identify deterioration in foetal well-being was a common finding among researchers examining reasons for litigation. Experienced midwives were at highest risk of litigation. Researchers found high levels of distress and abreaction among participants who either stopped working in birth suite or left midwifery. They also identified a level of ambiguity around defensive practices associated with fear of litigation. Conclusion: There is little research regarding experiences of midwives and clinical investigation. Midwives under investigation need appropriate support. Continuing to work during prolonged investigative processes is stressful as reported by midwives who described being "ill-equipped" and "unprepared." Midwives in the review preferred the support of colleagues over counsellors. Educators, employers and regulators need to work collaboratively and incorporate reflective practice in targeted support.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442-452
Number of pages11
JournalWomen and Birth
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Investigation
  • Litigation
  • Malpractice
  • Midwives
  • Negligence

Cite this

Alexander, Catherine R. ; Bogossian, Fiona. / Midwives and clinical investigation : A review of the literature. In: Women and Birth. 2018 ; Vol. 31, No. 6. pp. 442-452.
@article{9f27942224dc4e49b009f1f602a2f823,
title = "Midwives and clinical investigation: A review of the literature",
abstract = "Background: An allegation of negligence or an adverse outcome during childbirth can lead to clinical investigation of a midwife's practice. Anecdotal evidence suggests midwives find this stressful and disturbing. Aim: Synthesise the evidence relating to midwives' experiences of investigation and the effects on clinical practice and personal wellbeing. Methods: Two database searches were conducted between 2015 and 2016 to identify primary research published between 1990 and 2016. Studies were evaluated for quality using standard instruments. Findings: Despite numerous references to 'litigation' in peer-reviewed journals, little substantive research related specifically to midwives. 11 inclusions comprised three qualitative studies (one with two publications), reporting litigation experiences of midwives and seven quantitative studies (four research groups), identifying risk liability through cyclic surveys of midwives and law reports. Failure to identify deterioration in foetal well-being was a common finding among researchers examining reasons for litigation. Experienced midwives were at highest risk of litigation. Researchers found high levels of distress and abreaction among participants who either stopped working in birth suite or left midwifery. They also identified a level of ambiguity around defensive practices associated with fear of litigation. Conclusion: There is little research regarding experiences of midwives and clinical investigation. Midwives under investigation need appropriate support. Continuing to work during prolonged investigative processes is stressful as reported by midwives who described being {"}ill-equipped{"} and {"}unprepared.{"} Midwives in the review preferred the support of colleagues over counsellors. Educators, employers and regulators need to work collaboratively and incorporate reflective practice in targeted support.",
keywords = "Investigation, Litigation, Malpractice, Midwives, Negligence",
author = "Alexander, {Catherine R.} and Fiona Bogossian",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.wombi.2018.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "442--452",
journal = "Women and Birth",
issn = "1871-5192",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Midwives and clinical investigation : A review of the literature. / Alexander, Catherine R.; Bogossian, Fiona.

In: Women and Birth, Vol. 31, No. 6, 12.2018, p. 442-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Midwives and clinical investigation

T2 - A review of the literature

AU - Alexander, Catherine R.

AU - Bogossian, Fiona

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Background: An allegation of negligence or an adverse outcome during childbirth can lead to clinical investigation of a midwife's practice. Anecdotal evidence suggests midwives find this stressful and disturbing. Aim: Synthesise the evidence relating to midwives' experiences of investigation and the effects on clinical practice and personal wellbeing. Methods: Two database searches were conducted between 2015 and 2016 to identify primary research published between 1990 and 2016. Studies were evaluated for quality using standard instruments. Findings: Despite numerous references to 'litigation' in peer-reviewed journals, little substantive research related specifically to midwives. 11 inclusions comprised three qualitative studies (one with two publications), reporting litigation experiences of midwives and seven quantitative studies (four research groups), identifying risk liability through cyclic surveys of midwives and law reports. Failure to identify deterioration in foetal well-being was a common finding among researchers examining reasons for litigation. Experienced midwives were at highest risk of litigation. Researchers found high levels of distress and abreaction among participants who either stopped working in birth suite or left midwifery. They also identified a level of ambiguity around defensive practices associated with fear of litigation. Conclusion: There is little research regarding experiences of midwives and clinical investigation. Midwives under investigation need appropriate support. Continuing to work during prolonged investigative processes is stressful as reported by midwives who described being "ill-equipped" and "unprepared." Midwives in the review preferred the support of colleagues over counsellors. Educators, employers and regulators need to work collaboratively and incorporate reflective practice in targeted support.

AB - Background: An allegation of negligence or an adverse outcome during childbirth can lead to clinical investigation of a midwife's practice. Anecdotal evidence suggests midwives find this stressful and disturbing. Aim: Synthesise the evidence relating to midwives' experiences of investigation and the effects on clinical practice and personal wellbeing. Methods: Two database searches were conducted between 2015 and 2016 to identify primary research published between 1990 and 2016. Studies were evaluated for quality using standard instruments. Findings: Despite numerous references to 'litigation' in peer-reviewed journals, little substantive research related specifically to midwives. 11 inclusions comprised three qualitative studies (one with two publications), reporting litigation experiences of midwives and seven quantitative studies (four research groups), identifying risk liability through cyclic surveys of midwives and law reports. Failure to identify deterioration in foetal well-being was a common finding among researchers examining reasons for litigation. Experienced midwives were at highest risk of litigation. Researchers found high levels of distress and abreaction among participants who either stopped working in birth suite or left midwifery. They also identified a level of ambiguity around defensive practices associated with fear of litigation. Conclusion: There is little research regarding experiences of midwives and clinical investigation. Midwives under investigation need appropriate support. Continuing to work during prolonged investigative processes is stressful as reported by midwives who described being "ill-equipped" and "unprepared." Midwives in the review preferred the support of colleagues over counsellors. Educators, employers and regulators need to work collaboratively and incorporate reflective practice in targeted support.

KW - Investigation

KW - Litigation

KW - Malpractice

KW - Midwives

KW - Negligence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043279067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.02.003

M3 - Review Article

VL - 31

SP - 442

EP - 452

JO - Women and Birth

JF - Women and Birth

SN - 1871-5192

IS - 6

ER -