Middle leaders' learning in a university context

Margaret Franken, Dawn Penney, Christopher Branson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article focuses on the phenomenon of middle leadership in a university context and directs attention to the significance of learning as a central facet of leadership development. Drawing on the reflections of two of the authors as new middle leaders (chairpersons of departments), this article critically examines how middle leaders learn aspects of their role. Two tenets underpin our analysis: learning is fundamentally a social process - we learn with and from others; and learning is relational - what and how we learn is determined to some extent by others and affects others. Our experiences point to learning constraints and affordances arising from events, practices and artefacts. Constraints were largely associated with transmission learning experiences, while affordances were found in collaborative knowledge-sharing contexts that arose as information grounds in response to an information need. We argue that both those we lead, and the organisation itself, would likewise benefit from a knowledge-sharing perspective on learning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190 - 203
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

Franken, Margaret ; Penney, Dawn ; Branson, Christopher. / Middle leaders' learning in a university context. In: Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 190 - 203.
@article{5996490a99ac48dc855cc8b832f90282,
title = "Middle leaders' learning in a university context",
abstract = "This article focuses on the phenomenon of middle leadership in a university context and directs attention to the significance of learning as a central facet of leadership development. Drawing on the reflections of two of the authors as new middle leaders (chairpersons of departments), this article critically examines how middle leaders learn aspects of their role. Two tenets underpin our analysis: learning is fundamentally a social process - we learn with and from others; and learning is relational - what and how we learn is determined to some extent by others and affects others. Our experiences point to learning constraints and affordances arising from events, practices and artefacts. Constraints were largely associated with transmission learning experiences, while affordances were found in collaborative knowledge-sharing contexts that arose as information grounds in response to an information need. We argue that both those we lead, and the organisation itself, would likewise benefit from a knowledge-sharing perspective on learning.",
author = "Margaret Franken and Dawn Penney and Christopher Branson",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/1360080X.2015.1019120",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "190 -- 203",
journal = "Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management",
issn = "1360-080X",
publisher = "Brunner-Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Middle leaders' learning in a university context. / Franken, Margaret; Penney, Dawn; Branson, Christopher.

In: Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2015, p. 190 - 203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Middle leaders' learning in a university context

AU - Franken, Margaret

AU - Penney, Dawn

AU - Branson, Christopher

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article focuses on the phenomenon of middle leadership in a university context and directs attention to the significance of learning as a central facet of leadership development. Drawing on the reflections of two of the authors as new middle leaders (chairpersons of departments), this article critically examines how middle leaders learn aspects of their role. Two tenets underpin our analysis: learning is fundamentally a social process - we learn with and from others; and learning is relational - what and how we learn is determined to some extent by others and affects others. Our experiences point to learning constraints and affordances arising from events, practices and artefacts. Constraints were largely associated with transmission learning experiences, while affordances were found in collaborative knowledge-sharing contexts that arose as information grounds in response to an information need. We argue that both those we lead, and the organisation itself, would likewise benefit from a knowledge-sharing perspective on learning.

AB - This article focuses on the phenomenon of middle leadership in a university context and directs attention to the significance of learning as a central facet of leadership development. Drawing on the reflections of two of the authors as new middle leaders (chairpersons of departments), this article critically examines how middle leaders learn aspects of their role. Two tenets underpin our analysis: learning is fundamentally a social process - we learn with and from others; and learning is relational - what and how we learn is determined to some extent by others and affects others. Our experiences point to learning constraints and affordances arising from events, practices and artefacts. Constraints were largely associated with transmission learning experiences, while affordances were found in collaborative knowledge-sharing contexts that arose as information grounds in response to an information need. We argue that both those we lead, and the organisation itself, would likewise benefit from a knowledge-sharing perspective on learning.

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1019120

U2 - 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1019120

DO - 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1019120

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 190

EP - 203

JO - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

JF - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

SN - 1360-080X

IS - 2

ER -