Michel Serres: From restricted to general ecology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

Michel Serres's relation to ecocriticism is complex. On the one hand, he is a pioneer in the area, anticipating the current fashion for ecological thought by over a decade. On the other hand, 'ecology' and 'eco-criticism' are singularly infelicitous terms to describe Serres's thinking if they are taken to indicate that attention should be paid to particular 'environmental' concerns. For Serres, such local, circumscribed ideas as 'ecology' or 'eco-philosophy' are one of the causes of our ecological crisis, and no progress can be made while such narrow concerns govern our thinking. This chapter intervenes in the ongoing discussion about the relation of Serres to ecology by drawing on some of Serres's more recent texts on pollution and dwelling, and this fresh material leads us to modulate existing treatments of Serres and ecology. I insist on the inextricability of two senses of ecology in Serres's approach: a broader meaning that refers to the interconnectedness and inextricability of all entities (natural and cultural, material and ideal), and a narrower sense that evokes classically 'environmental' concerns. Serres's recent work leads us to challenge some of the vectors and assumptions of the debate by radicalising the continuity between 'natural' and 'cultural' phenomena, questioning some of the commonplaces that structure almost all ecological thinking, and arguing that the entire paradigm of ecology as 'conservation' and 'protection' is bankrupt and self-undermining. After outlining the shape of Serres's 'general ecology' and its opposition to ecology as conservation, this chapter asks what sorts of practices and values a Serresian general ecology can engender when it considers birdsong, advertising, industrial pollution and money to be manifestations of the same drive for appropriation through pollution. A response is given in terms of three key Serresian motifs: the world as fetish, parasitic symbiosis, and global cosmocracy.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFrench Ecocriticism
Subtitle of host publicationFrom the Early Modern Period to the Twenty-First Century
EditorsDaniel A. Finch-Race, Stephanie Posthumus
Place of PublicationFrankfurt Germany
PublisherPeter Lang Publishing
Pages153-172
Number of pages20
Volume1
ISBN (Electronic)9783631673454
ISBN (Print)9783631673454
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NameStudies in Literature, Culture, And the Environment
PublisherPeter Lang Edition

Cite this

Watkin, C. (2017). Michel Serres: From restricted to general ecology. In D. A. Finch-Race, & S. Posthumus (Eds.), French Ecocriticism: From the Early Modern Period to the Twenty-First Century (Vol. 1, pp. 153-172). (Studies in Literature, Culture, And the Environment). Frankfurt Germany: Peter Lang Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-06606-7
Watkin, Christopher. / Michel Serres : From restricted to general ecology. French Ecocriticism: From the Early Modern Period to the Twenty-First Century. editor / Daniel A. Finch-Race ; Stephanie Posthumus. Vol. 1 Frankfurt Germany : Peter Lang Publishing, 2017. pp. 153-172 (Studies in Literature, Culture, And the Environment).
@inbook{777e3403e2c14910b6fc381b1a3da13a,
title = "Michel Serres: From restricted to general ecology",
abstract = "Michel Serres's relation to ecocriticism is complex. On the one hand, he is a pioneer in the area, anticipating the current fashion for ecological thought by over a decade. On the other hand, 'ecology' and 'eco-criticism' are singularly infelicitous terms to describe Serres's thinking if they are taken to indicate that attention should be paid to particular 'environmental' concerns. For Serres, such local, circumscribed ideas as 'ecology' or 'eco-philosophy' are one of the causes of our ecological crisis, and no progress can be made while such narrow concerns govern our thinking. This chapter intervenes in the ongoing discussion about the relation of Serres to ecology by drawing on some of Serres's more recent texts on pollution and dwelling, and this fresh material leads us to modulate existing treatments of Serres and ecology. I insist on the inextricability of two senses of ecology in Serres's approach: a broader meaning that refers to the interconnectedness and inextricability of all entities (natural and cultural, material and ideal), and a narrower sense that evokes classically 'environmental' concerns. Serres's recent work leads us to challenge some of the vectors and assumptions of the debate by radicalising the continuity between 'natural' and 'cultural' phenomena, questioning some of the commonplaces that structure almost all ecological thinking, and arguing that the entire paradigm of ecology as 'conservation' and 'protection' is bankrupt and self-undermining. After outlining the shape of Serres's 'general ecology' and its opposition to ecology as conservation, this chapter asks what sorts of practices and values a Serresian general ecology can engender when it considers birdsong, advertising, industrial pollution and money to be manifestations of the same drive for appropriation through pollution. A response is given in terms of three key Serresian motifs: the world as fetish, parasitic symbiosis, and global cosmocracy.",
author = "Christopher Watkin",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.3726/978-3-653-06606-7",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783631673454",
volume = "1",
series = "Studies in Literature, Culture, And the Environment",
publisher = "Peter Lang Publishing",
pages = "153--172",
editor = "Finch-Race, {Daniel A.} and Stephanie Posthumus",
booktitle = "French Ecocriticism",
address = "Germany",

}

Watkin, C 2017, Michel Serres: From restricted to general ecology. in DA Finch-Race & S Posthumus (eds), French Ecocriticism: From the Early Modern Period to the Twenty-First Century. vol. 1, Studies in Literature, Culture, And the Environment, Peter Lang Publishing, Frankfurt Germany, pp. 153-172. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-06606-7

Michel Serres : From restricted to general ecology. / Watkin, Christopher.

French Ecocriticism: From the Early Modern Period to the Twenty-First Century. ed. / Daniel A. Finch-Race; Stephanie Posthumus. Vol. 1 Frankfurt Germany : Peter Lang Publishing, 2017. p. 153-172 (Studies in Literature, Culture, And the Environment).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Michel Serres

T2 - From restricted to general ecology

AU - Watkin, Christopher

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Michel Serres's relation to ecocriticism is complex. On the one hand, he is a pioneer in the area, anticipating the current fashion for ecological thought by over a decade. On the other hand, 'ecology' and 'eco-criticism' are singularly infelicitous terms to describe Serres's thinking if they are taken to indicate that attention should be paid to particular 'environmental' concerns. For Serres, such local, circumscribed ideas as 'ecology' or 'eco-philosophy' are one of the causes of our ecological crisis, and no progress can be made while such narrow concerns govern our thinking. This chapter intervenes in the ongoing discussion about the relation of Serres to ecology by drawing on some of Serres's more recent texts on pollution and dwelling, and this fresh material leads us to modulate existing treatments of Serres and ecology. I insist on the inextricability of two senses of ecology in Serres's approach: a broader meaning that refers to the interconnectedness and inextricability of all entities (natural and cultural, material and ideal), and a narrower sense that evokes classically 'environmental' concerns. Serres's recent work leads us to challenge some of the vectors and assumptions of the debate by radicalising the continuity between 'natural' and 'cultural' phenomena, questioning some of the commonplaces that structure almost all ecological thinking, and arguing that the entire paradigm of ecology as 'conservation' and 'protection' is bankrupt and self-undermining. After outlining the shape of Serres's 'general ecology' and its opposition to ecology as conservation, this chapter asks what sorts of practices and values a Serresian general ecology can engender when it considers birdsong, advertising, industrial pollution and money to be manifestations of the same drive for appropriation through pollution. A response is given in terms of three key Serresian motifs: the world as fetish, parasitic symbiosis, and global cosmocracy.

AB - Michel Serres's relation to ecocriticism is complex. On the one hand, he is a pioneer in the area, anticipating the current fashion for ecological thought by over a decade. On the other hand, 'ecology' and 'eco-criticism' are singularly infelicitous terms to describe Serres's thinking if they are taken to indicate that attention should be paid to particular 'environmental' concerns. For Serres, such local, circumscribed ideas as 'ecology' or 'eco-philosophy' are one of the causes of our ecological crisis, and no progress can be made while such narrow concerns govern our thinking. This chapter intervenes in the ongoing discussion about the relation of Serres to ecology by drawing on some of Serres's more recent texts on pollution and dwelling, and this fresh material leads us to modulate existing treatments of Serres and ecology. I insist on the inextricability of two senses of ecology in Serres's approach: a broader meaning that refers to the interconnectedness and inextricability of all entities (natural and cultural, material and ideal), and a narrower sense that evokes classically 'environmental' concerns. Serres's recent work leads us to challenge some of the vectors and assumptions of the debate by radicalising the continuity between 'natural' and 'cultural' phenomena, questioning some of the commonplaces that structure almost all ecological thinking, and arguing that the entire paradigm of ecology as 'conservation' and 'protection' is bankrupt and self-undermining. After outlining the shape of Serres's 'general ecology' and its opposition to ecology as conservation, this chapter asks what sorts of practices and values a Serresian general ecology can engender when it considers birdsong, advertising, industrial pollution and money to be manifestations of the same drive for appropriation through pollution. A response is given in terms of three key Serresian motifs: the world as fetish, parasitic symbiosis, and global cosmocracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034088332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3726/978-3-653-06606-7

DO - 10.3726/978-3-653-06606-7

M3 - Chapter (Book)

SN - 9783631673454

VL - 1

T3 - Studies in Literature, Culture, And the Environment

SP - 153

EP - 172

BT - French Ecocriticism

A2 - Finch-Race, Daniel A.

A2 - Posthumus, Stephanie

PB - Peter Lang Publishing

CY - Frankfurt Germany

ER -

Watkin C. Michel Serres: From restricted to general ecology. In Finch-Race DA, Posthumus S, editors, French Ecocriticism: From the Early Modern Period to the Twenty-First Century. Vol. 1. Frankfurt Germany: Peter Lang Publishing. 2017. p. 153-172. (Studies in Literature, Culture, And the Environment). https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-06606-7