Abstract
Graph layout algorithms typically conform to one or more aesthetic criteria (e.g. minimizing the number of bends, maximizing othrogonality). Determining the extent to which a graph drawing conforms to an aesthetic criterion tends to be done informally, and varies between different algorithms. This paper presents formal metrics for measuring the aesthetic presence in a graph drawing for seven common aesthetic criteria, applicable to any graph drawing of anysize. The metrics are useful for determining the aesthetic quality of a given graph drawing, or for defining a cost function for genetic algorithms or simulated annealing programs. The metrics are continous, so that aesthetic quality is not stated as a binary conformance decision (i.e. the drawing either conforms to the aesthetic or not), but can be stated as the extent of aesthetic conformance using a number between 0 and 1. The paper presents the seven metric formulae. The application of these metrics is demonstrated through the aesthetic analysis of example graph drawings produced by common layout algorithms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 501-516 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Visual Languages and Computing |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Aesthetics
- Graph drawing
- Metrics
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver