Meta-analysis of the relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases

Daniel Leung, Petra K. Staiger, Melissa Hayden, Jarrad A.G. Lum, Kate Hall, Victoria Manning, Antonio Verdejo-Garcia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background Evidence indicates that substance-related cognitive biases (attentional, memory, and approach bias) contribute to the maintenance and development of substance misuse. Impulsivity has been suggested to influence how cognitive biases contribute to substance misuse, possibly by biasing incentive salience attribution processes. However, the strength and moderators of the relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases has yet to be empirically examined. Methods A meta-analysis using random-effects models was completed assessing 19 studies that reported a quantitative relationship between an impulsivity measure and a substance-related cognitive bias. Two-component conceptualisation of impulsivity, impulsivity measurement type, gender, and age were assessed as moderators. Results A small, significant positive relationship (r = 0.10) was observed between impulsivity and substance-related attentional, memory, and approach biases. No moderators examined had a significant influence on this relationship. Conclusions Results are consistent with incentive sensitisation theories of addiction and suggests a weak synergistic relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases. This relationship holds across different measures and components of impulsivity. Results provide some support for the viability of impulsivity and cognitive bias interaction models which may warrant further investigation of these factors in relation to predicting addiction treatment outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-33
Number of pages13
JournalDrug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • Cognitive bias
  • Impulsivity
  • Meta-analysis
  • Review
  • Substance misuse

Cite this

Leung, Daniel ; Staiger, Petra K. ; Hayden, Melissa ; Lum, Jarrad A.G. ; Hall, Kate ; Manning, Victoria ; Verdejo-Garcia, Antonio. / Meta-analysis of the relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases. In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2017 ; Vol. 172. pp. 21-33.
@article{05c3a7bf232c48ee9e8fc581faa80014,
title = "Meta-analysis of the relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases",
abstract = "Background Evidence indicates that substance-related cognitive biases (attentional, memory, and approach bias) contribute to the maintenance and development of substance misuse. Impulsivity has been suggested to influence how cognitive biases contribute to substance misuse, possibly by biasing incentive salience attribution processes. However, the strength and moderators of the relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases has yet to be empirically examined. Methods A meta-analysis using random-effects models was completed assessing 19 studies that reported a quantitative relationship between an impulsivity measure and a substance-related cognitive bias. Two-component conceptualisation of impulsivity, impulsivity measurement type, gender, and age were assessed as moderators. Results A small, significant positive relationship (r = 0.10) was observed between impulsivity and substance-related attentional, memory, and approach biases. No moderators examined had a significant influence on this relationship. Conclusions Results are consistent with incentive sensitisation theories of addiction and suggests a weak synergistic relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases. This relationship holds across different measures and components of impulsivity. Results provide some support for the viability of impulsivity and cognitive bias interaction models which may warrant further investigation of these factors in relation to predicting addiction treatment outcomes.",
keywords = "Cognitive bias, Impulsivity, Meta-analysis, Review, Substance misuse",
author = "Daniel Leung and Staiger, {Petra K.} and Melissa Hayden and Lum, {Jarrad A.G.} and Kate Hall and Victoria Manning and Antonio Verdejo-Garcia",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.034",
language = "English",
volume = "172",
pages = "21--33",
journal = "Drug and Alcohol Dependence",
issn = "0376-8716",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Meta-analysis of the relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases. / Leung, Daniel; Staiger, Petra K.; Hayden, Melissa; Lum, Jarrad A.G.; Hall, Kate; Manning, Victoria; Verdejo-Garcia, Antonio.

In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 172, 01.03.2017, p. 21-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-analysis of the relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases

AU - Leung, Daniel

AU - Staiger, Petra K.

AU - Hayden, Melissa

AU - Lum, Jarrad A.G.

AU - Hall, Kate

AU - Manning, Victoria

AU - Verdejo-Garcia, Antonio

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background Evidence indicates that substance-related cognitive biases (attentional, memory, and approach bias) contribute to the maintenance and development of substance misuse. Impulsivity has been suggested to influence how cognitive biases contribute to substance misuse, possibly by biasing incentive salience attribution processes. However, the strength and moderators of the relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases has yet to be empirically examined. Methods A meta-analysis using random-effects models was completed assessing 19 studies that reported a quantitative relationship between an impulsivity measure and a substance-related cognitive bias. Two-component conceptualisation of impulsivity, impulsivity measurement type, gender, and age were assessed as moderators. Results A small, significant positive relationship (r = 0.10) was observed between impulsivity and substance-related attentional, memory, and approach biases. No moderators examined had a significant influence on this relationship. Conclusions Results are consistent with incentive sensitisation theories of addiction and suggests a weak synergistic relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases. This relationship holds across different measures and components of impulsivity. Results provide some support for the viability of impulsivity and cognitive bias interaction models which may warrant further investigation of these factors in relation to predicting addiction treatment outcomes.

AB - Background Evidence indicates that substance-related cognitive biases (attentional, memory, and approach bias) contribute to the maintenance and development of substance misuse. Impulsivity has been suggested to influence how cognitive biases contribute to substance misuse, possibly by biasing incentive salience attribution processes. However, the strength and moderators of the relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases has yet to be empirically examined. Methods A meta-analysis using random-effects models was completed assessing 19 studies that reported a quantitative relationship between an impulsivity measure and a substance-related cognitive bias. Two-component conceptualisation of impulsivity, impulsivity measurement type, gender, and age were assessed as moderators. Results A small, significant positive relationship (r = 0.10) was observed between impulsivity and substance-related attentional, memory, and approach biases. No moderators examined had a significant influence on this relationship. Conclusions Results are consistent with incentive sensitisation theories of addiction and suggests a weak synergistic relationship between impulsivity and substance-related cognitive biases. This relationship holds across different measures and components of impulsivity. Results provide some support for the viability of impulsivity and cognitive bias interaction models which may warrant further investigation of these factors in relation to predicting addiction treatment outcomes.

KW - Cognitive bias

KW - Impulsivity

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Review

KW - Substance misuse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009476528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.034

DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.034

M3 - Review Article

VL - 172

SP - 21

EP - 33

JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

SN - 0376-8716

ER -