"Mental disorder" and sentencing: resolving the definitional problem

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Mental health problems affect the majority of people who face the sentencing process. The fact that a convicted offender has mental health problems may be taken into account in various ways: it may mitigate or aggravate the penalty, or may affect the type of sanction that is imposed or its conditions. At present, sentencing judges use a two-stage process to determine the effect (if any) that an offender's mental health problems should have on the sentencing determination. First, they ascertain whether the offender has a relevant mental health problem. If they find that he or she does, they then decide what effect that mental health problem should have on the sentencing determination. This article compares recent approaches that have been taken to the first stage of this process in Australia and Canada. It highlights difficulties with both approaches, and recommends replacing the current two-stage process with an integrated, single-stage approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-169
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of law and medicine
Volume26
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Criminal law
  • Mental disorder
  • Mental health
  • Mental illness
  • Sentencing

Cite this

@article{ad1b522b216c47898dd81bb45797c2c5,
title = "{"}Mental disorder{"} and sentencing: resolving the definitional problem",
abstract = "Mental health problems affect the majority of people who face the sentencing process. The fact that a convicted offender has mental health problems may be taken into account in various ways: it may mitigate or aggravate the penalty, or may affect the type of sanction that is imposed or its conditions. At present, sentencing judges use a two-stage process to determine the effect (if any) that an offender's mental health problems should have on the sentencing determination. First, they ascertain whether the offender has a relevant mental health problem. If they find that he or she does, they then decide what effect that mental health problem should have on the sentencing determination. This article compares recent approaches that have been taken to the first stage of this process in Australia and Canada. It highlights difficulties with both approaches, and recommends replacing the current two-stage process with an integrated, single-stage approach.",
keywords = "Criminal law, Mental disorder, Mental health, Mental illness, Sentencing",
author = "Jamie Walvisch",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "159--169",
journal = "Journal of law and medicine",
issn = "1320-159X",
publisher = "Thomson Reuters (Prous Science)",
number = "1",

}

"Mental disorder" and sentencing : resolving the definitional problem. / Walvisch, Jamie.

In: Journal of law and medicine, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2018, p. 159-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Mental disorder" and sentencing

T2 - resolving the definitional problem

AU - Walvisch, Jamie

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Mental health problems affect the majority of people who face the sentencing process. The fact that a convicted offender has mental health problems may be taken into account in various ways: it may mitigate or aggravate the penalty, or may affect the type of sanction that is imposed or its conditions. At present, sentencing judges use a two-stage process to determine the effect (if any) that an offender's mental health problems should have on the sentencing determination. First, they ascertain whether the offender has a relevant mental health problem. If they find that he or she does, they then decide what effect that mental health problem should have on the sentencing determination. This article compares recent approaches that have been taken to the first stage of this process in Australia and Canada. It highlights difficulties with both approaches, and recommends replacing the current two-stage process with an integrated, single-stage approach.

AB - Mental health problems affect the majority of people who face the sentencing process. The fact that a convicted offender has mental health problems may be taken into account in various ways: it may mitigate or aggravate the penalty, or may affect the type of sanction that is imposed or its conditions. At present, sentencing judges use a two-stage process to determine the effect (if any) that an offender's mental health problems should have on the sentencing determination. First, they ascertain whether the offender has a relevant mental health problem. If they find that he or she does, they then decide what effect that mental health problem should have on the sentencing determination. This article compares recent approaches that have been taken to the first stage of this process in Australia and Canada. It highlights difficulties with both approaches, and recommends replacing the current two-stage process with an integrated, single-stage approach.

KW - Criminal law

KW - Mental disorder

KW - Mental health

KW - Mental illness

KW - Sentencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062573597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review Article

VL - 26

SP - 159

EP - 169

JO - Journal of law and medicine

JF - Journal of law and medicine

SN - 1320-159X

IS - 1

ER -