TY - JOUR
T1 - Medical cannabis or cannabinoids for chronic pain
T2 - A clinical practice guideline
AU - Busse, Jason W.
AU - Vankrunkelsven, Patrick
AU - Zeng, Linan
AU - Heen, Anja Fog
AU - Merglen, Arnaud
AU - Campbell, Fiona
AU - Petter, Lars
AU - Aertgeerts, Bert
AU - Buchbinder, Rachelle
AU - Coen, Matteo
AU - Juurlink, David
AU - Samer, Caroline
AU - Siemieniuk, Reed A.C.
AU - Kumar, Nimisha
AU - Cooper, Lynn
AU - Brown, John
AU - Lytvyn, Lyubov
AU - Zeraatkar, Dena
AU - Wang, Li
AU - Guyatt, Gordon H.
AU - Vandvik, Per O.
AU - Agoritsas, Thomas
N1 - Funding Information:
Industry funded (21 trials) No industry funding (6 trials) Not reported (5 trials)
Publisher Copyright:
© Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9/8
Y1 - 2021/9/8
N2 - Clinical question What is the role of medical cannabis or cannabinoids for people living with chronic pain due to cancer or non-cancer causes? Current practice Chronic pain is common and distressing and associated with considerable socioeconomic burden globally. Medical cannabis is increasingly used to manage chronic pain, particularly in jurisdictions that have enacted policies to reduce use of opioids; however, existing guideline recommendations are inconsistent, and cannabis remains illegal for therapeutic use in many countries. Recommendation The guideline expert panel issued a weak recommendation to offer a trial of non-inhaled medical cannabis or cannabinoids, in addition to standard care and management (if not sufficient), for people living with chronic cancer or non-cancer pain. How this guideline was created An international guideline development panel including patients, clinicians with content expertise, and methodologists produced this recommendation in adherence with standards for trustworthy guidelines using the GRADE approach. The MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation (MAGIC) provided methodological support. The panel applied an individual patient perspective. The evidence This recommendation is informed by a linked series of four systematic reviews summarising the current body of evidence for benefits and harms, as well as patient values and preferences, regarding medical cannabis or cannabinoids for chronic pain. Understanding the recommendation The recommendation is weak because of the close balance between benefits and harms of medical cannabis for chronic pain. It reflects a high value placed on small to very small improvements in self reported pain intensity, physical functioning, and sleep quality, and willingness to accept a small to modest risk of mostly self limited and transient harms. Shared decision making is required to ensure patients make choices that reflect their values and personal context. Further research is warranted and may alter this recommendation.
AB - Clinical question What is the role of medical cannabis or cannabinoids for people living with chronic pain due to cancer or non-cancer causes? Current practice Chronic pain is common and distressing and associated with considerable socioeconomic burden globally. Medical cannabis is increasingly used to manage chronic pain, particularly in jurisdictions that have enacted policies to reduce use of opioids; however, existing guideline recommendations are inconsistent, and cannabis remains illegal for therapeutic use in many countries. Recommendation The guideline expert panel issued a weak recommendation to offer a trial of non-inhaled medical cannabis or cannabinoids, in addition to standard care and management (if not sufficient), for people living with chronic cancer or non-cancer pain. How this guideline was created An international guideline development panel including patients, clinicians with content expertise, and methodologists produced this recommendation in adherence with standards for trustworthy guidelines using the GRADE approach. The MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation (MAGIC) provided methodological support. The panel applied an individual patient perspective. The evidence This recommendation is informed by a linked series of four systematic reviews summarising the current body of evidence for benefits and harms, as well as patient values and preferences, regarding medical cannabis or cannabinoids for chronic pain. Understanding the recommendation The recommendation is weak because of the close balance between benefits and harms of medical cannabis for chronic pain. It reflects a high value placed on small to very small improvements in self reported pain intensity, physical functioning, and sleep quality, and willingness to accept a small to modest risk of mostly self limited and transient harms. Shared decision making is required to ensure patients make choices that reflect their values and personal context. Further research is warranted and may alter this recommendation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114788495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmj.n2040
DO - 10.1136/bmj.n2040
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 34497062
AN - SCOPUS:85114788495
SN - 0959-535X
VL - 374
JO - The BMJ
JF - The BMJ
M1 - n2040
ER -