TY - JOUR
T1 - Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer among Australasian thoracic physicians
T2 - Clinical practice and constraints on minimally invasive techniques
AU - Dabscheck, E. J.
AU - Steinfort, D. P.
AU - Irving, L. B.
AU - Hew, M.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Background/Aim: We determined current practice among Australasian thoracic physicians in the mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focused on the availability of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and constraints to its use, as there has been no systematic analysis regarding the availability and uptake of this new technology among thoracic physicians. Methods: Physician members of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand were emailed a survey seeking their current approach to three scenarios requiring mediastinal staging of NSCLC. Respondents were also asked for their preferred investigation for each scenario if any current constraints were removed. Relevant demographic information was sought. Results: We received 164 responses from 512 Australasian physicians (34%). Without constraints, EBUS-TBNA was the preferred investigation for all three clinical scenarios, but only 33% of respondents had access to EBUS-TBNA. Constraints included lack of availability and lack of expertise. Reduced EBUS-TBNA access was associated with a number of clinician factors. Conclusions: Australasian thoracic physicians prefer EBUS-TBNA for the mediastinal staging of NSCLC, but access to EBUS-TBNA services is limited. We recommend targeted measures to improve access to EBUS-TBNA use and optimise mediastinal staging of NSCLC.
AB - Background/Aim: We determined current practice among Australasian thoracic physicians in the mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focused on the availability of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and constraints to its use, as there has been no systematic analysis regarding the availability and uptake of this new technology among thoracic physicians. Methods: Physician members of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand were emailed a survey seeking their current approach to three scenarios requiring mediastinal staging of NSCLC. Respondents were also asked for their preferred investigation for each scenario if any current constraints were removed. Relevant demographic information was sought. Results: We received 164 responses from 512 Australasian physicians (34%). Without constraints, EBUS-TBNA was the preferred investigation for all three clinical scenarios, but only 33% of respondents had access to EBUS-TBNA. Constraints included lack of availability and lack of expertise. Reduced EBUS-TBNA access was associated with a number of clinician factors. Conclusions: Australasian thoracic physicians prefer EBUS-TBNA for the mediastinal staging of NSCLC, but access to EBUS-TBNA services is limited. We recommend targeted measures to improve access to EBUS-TBNA use and optimise mediastinal staging of NSCLC.
KW - Access to health services
KW - Endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)
KW - Mediastinal staging
KW - Non-small-cell lung carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862539985&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02683.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02683.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 22188414
AN - SCOPUS:84862539985
SN - 1444-0903
VL - 42
SP - 627
EP - 633
JO - Internal Medicine Journal
JF - Internal Medicine Journal
IS - 6
ER -