Mechanisms of brief contact interventions in clinical populations: A systematic review

Allison Milner, Matthew J Spittal, Navneet Kapur, Katrina Witt, Jane Pirkis, Gregory Carter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brief Contact Interventions (BCIs) have been of increasing interest to suicide prevention clinicians, researchers and policy makers. However, there has been no systematic assessment into the mechanisms underpinning BCIs. The aim of the current paper is to provide a systematic review of the proposed mechanisms underpinning BCIs across trial studies.

METHOD: A systematic review was conducted of trials using BCIs (post-discharge telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts) for suicide or self-harm. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of all past reviews in the area. Secondary searches of reference lists were undertaken.

RESULTS: Sixteen papers provided a description of possible mechanisms which we grouped into three main areas: social support; suicide prevention literacy, and; learning alternative coping behaviours. After assessment of the studies and considering the plausibility of mechanisms, we suggest social support and improved suicide prevention literacy are the most likely mechanisms underpinning BCIs.

CONCLUSION: Researchers need to better articulate and measure the mechanisms they believe underpin BCIs in trial studies. Understanding more about the mechanisms of BCIs' will inform the development of future interventions for self-harm and suicide.
Original languageEnglish
Article number194
Number of pages10
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Milner, A., Spittal, M. J., Kapur, N., Witt, K., Pirkis, J., & Carter, G. (2016). Mechanisms of brief contact interventions in clinical populations: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 16, [194]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0896-4
Milner, Allison ; Spittal, Matthew J ; Kapur, Navneet ; Witt, Katrina ; Pirkis, Jane ; Carter, Gregory. / Mechanisms of brief contact interventions in clinical populations : A systematic review. In: BMC Psychiatry. 2016 ; Vol. 16.
@article{93fd9fb626394793bdef5acf9a99f56f,
title = "Mechanisms of brief contact interventions in clinical populations: A systematic review",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Brief Contact Interventions (BCIs) have been of increasing interest to suicide prevention clinicians, researchers and policy makers. However, there has been no systematic assessment into the mechanisms underpinning BCIs. The aim of the current paper is to provide a systematic review of the proposed mechanisms underpinning BCIs across trial studies. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted of trials using BCIs (post-discharge telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts) for suicide or self-harm. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of all past reviews in the area. Secondary searches of reference lists were undertaken. RESULTS: Sixteen papers provided a description of possible mechanisms which we grouped into three main areas: social support; suicide prevention literacy, and; learning alternative coping behaviours. After assessment of the studies and considering the plausibility of mechanisms, we suggest social support and improved suicide prevention literacy are the most likely mechanisms underpinning BCIs. CONCLUSION: Researchers need to better articulate and measure the mechanisms they believe underpin BCIs in trial studies. Understanding more about the mechanisms of BCIs' will inform the development of future interventions for self-harm and suicide.",
author = "Allison Milner and Spittal, {Matthew J} and Navneet Kapur and Katrina Witt and Jane Pirkis and Gregory Carter",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1186/s12888-016-0896-4",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "BMC Psychiatry",
issn = "1471-244X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

Mechanisms of brief contact interventions in clinical populations : A systematic review. / Milner, Allison; Spittal, Matthew J; Kapur, Navneet; Witt, Katrina; Pirkis, Jane; Carter, Gregory.

In: BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 16, 194, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanisms of brief contact interventions in clinical populations

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Milner, Allison

AU - Spittal, Matthew J

AU - Kapur, Navneet

AU - Witt, Katrina

AU - Pirkis, Jane

AU - Carter, Gregory

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - BACKGROUND: Brief Contact Interventions (BCIs) have been of increasing interest to suicide prevention clinicians, researchers and policy makers. However, there has been no systematic assessment into the mechanisms underpinning BCIs. The aim of the current paper is to provide a systematic review of the proposed mechanisms underpinning BCIs across trial studies. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted of trials using BCIs (post-discharge telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts) for suicide or self-harm. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of all past reviews in the area. Secondary searches of reference lists were undertaken. RESULTS: Sixteen papers provided a description of possible mechanisms which we grouped into three main areas: social support; suicide prevention literacy, and; learning alternative coping behaviours. After assessment of the studies and considering the plausibility of mechanisms, we suggest social support and improved suicide prevention literacy are the most likely mechanisms underpinning BCIs. CONCLUSION: Researchers need to better articulate and measure the mechanisms they believe underpin BCIs in trial studies. Understanding more about the mechanisms of BCIs' will inform the development of future interventions for self-harm and suicide.

AB - BACKGROUND: Brief Contact Interventions (BCIs) have been of increasing interest to suicide prevention clinicians, researchers and policy makers. However, there has been no systematic assessment into the mechanisms underpinning BCIs. The aim of the current paper is to provide a systematic review of the proposed mechanisms underpinning BCIs across trial studies. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted of trials using BCIs (post-discharge telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts) for suicide or self-harm. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of all past reviews in the area. Secondary searches of reference lists were undertaken. RESULTS: Sixteen papers provided a description of possible mechanisms which we grouped into three main areas: social support; suicide prevention literacy, and; learning alternative coping behaviours. After assessment of the studies and considering the plausibility of mechanisms, we suggest social support and improved suicide prevention literacy are the most likely mechanisms underpinning BCIs. CONCLUSION: Researchers need to better articulate and measure the mechanisms they believe underpin BCIs in trial studies. Understanding more about the mechanisms of BCIs' will inform the development of future interventions for self-harm and suicide.

U2 - 10.1186/s12888-016-0896-4

DO - 10.1186/s12888-016-0896-4

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - BMC Psychiatry

JF - BMC Psychiatry

SN - 1471-244X

M1 - 194

ER -