Measuring the quality of perioperative care in cardiac surgery

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quality of care is of increasing importance in health and surgical care. In order to maintain and improve quality, we must be able to measure it and identify variation. In this narrative review, we aim to identify measures used in the assessment of quality of care in cardiac surgery and to evaluate their utility. The electronic databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL were searched for original published studies using the terms ‘cardiac surgery' and ‘quality or outcome or process or structure' as either keywords in the title or text or MeSH terms. Secondary searches and identification of references from original articles were carried out. We found a total of 54 original articles evaluating measurements of quality. While structure, process, and outcome indicators remain the mainstay of quality measurement, new and innovative methods of risk assessment have improved reliability and discrimination. Continuous assessment provides a promising method of both maintaining and improving quality of care. Future studies should focus on long-term and patient-centred outcomes, such as quality-of-life measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-19
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Cardiac
  • Quality
  • Quality of health care
  • Safety
  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{fd7194b9b4ab4dfc8801a104baff8ff8,
title = "Measuring the quality of perioperative care in cardiac surgery",
abstract = "Quality of care is of increasing importance in health and surgical care. In order to maintain and improve quality, we must be able to measure it and identify variation. In this narrative review, we aim to identify measures used in the assessment of quality of care in cardiac surgery and to evaluate their utility. The electronic databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL were searched for original published studies using the terms ‘cardiac surgery' and ‘quality or outcome or process or structure' as either keywords in the title or text or MeSH terms. Secondary searches and identification of references from original articles were carried out. We found a total of 54 original articles evaluating measurements of quality. While structure, process, and outcome indicators remain the mainstay of quality measurement, new and innovative methods of risk assessment have improved reliability and discrimination. Continuous assessment provides a promising method of both maintaining and improving quality of care. Future studies should focus on long-term and patient-centred outcomes, such as quality-of-life measures.",
keywords = "Cardiac, Quality, Quality of health care, Safety, Surgery",
author = "Coulson, {Tim G.} and Mullany, {Daniel V.} and Reid, {Christopher M.} and Michael Bailey and David Pilcher",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw027",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "11--19",
journal = "European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes",
issn = "2058-5225",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Measuring the quality of perioperative care in cardiac surgery. / Coulson, Tim G.; Mullany, Daniel V.; Reid, Christopher M.; Bailey, Michael; Pilcher, David.

In: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 11-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the quality of perioperative care in cardiac surgery

AU - Coulson, Tim G.

AU - Mullany, Daniel V.

AU - Reid, Christopher M.

AU - Bailey, Michael

AU - Pilcher, David

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Quality of care is of increasing importance in health and surgical care. In order to maintain and improve quality, we must be able to measure it and identify variation. In this narrative review, we aim to identify measures used in the assessment of quality of care in cardiac surgery and to evaluate their utility. The electronic databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL were searched for original published studies using the terms ‘cardiac surgery' and ‘quality or outcome or process or structure' as either keywords in the title or text or MeSH terms. Secondary searches and identification of references from original articles were carried out. We found a total of 54 original articles evaluating measurements of quality. While structure, process, and outcome indicators remain the mainstay of quality measurement, new and innovative methods of risk assessment have improved reliability and discrimination. Continuous assessment provides a promising method of both maintaining and improving quality of care. Future studies should focus on long-term and patient-centred outcomes, such as quality-of-life measures.

AB - Quality of care is of increasing importance in health and surgical care. In order to maintain and improve quality, we must be able to measure it and identify variation. In this narrative review, we aim to identify measures used in the assessment of quality of care in cardiac surgery and to evaluate their utility. The electronic databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL were searched for original published studies using the terms ‘cardiac surgery' and ‘quality or outcome or process or structure' as either keywords in the title or text or MeSH terms. Secondary searches and identification of references from original articles were carried out. We found a total of 54 original articles evaluating measurements of quality. While structure, process, and outcome indicators remain the mainstay of quality measurement, new and innovative methods of risk assessment have improved reliability and discrimination. Continuous assessment provides a promising method of both maintaining and improving quality of care. Future studies should focus on long-term and patient-centred outcomes, such as quality-of-life measures.

KW - Cardiac

KW - Quality

KW - Quality of health care

KW - Safety

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047052443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw027

DO - 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw027

M3 - Review Article

VL - 3

SP - 11

EP - 19

JO - European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes

JF - European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes

SN - 2058-5225

IS - 1

ER -