TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring the gap between perceived importance and actual performance of institutional repositories
AU - Lagzian, Fatemeh
AU - Abrizah, A.
AU - Wee, Mee Chin
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was conducted with the support of a UMRG grant ( RP005C13ICT ) from the University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur . The authors are deeply grateful to the study participants for their invaluable contribution in this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Identifying the critical success factors (CSFs) of institutional repositories can influence their successful implementation. This study investigates the perceived importance of the success factors and the actual performance of institutional repositories worldwide. A web-based questionnaire was distributed to 354 repository managers via the OpenDOAR email distribution service and achieved a response rate of 83.3%. Factor analysis indicated the possibility of 46 variables under six factors being important for the success of institutional repository implementation. The six factors are Management, Services, Technology, Self-archive practices, People, and Resources. A gap analysis was conducted to identify the importance and actual performance of the factors. The major finding was that several of the factors are not fully realised by the institutional repositories despite their relative importance. Institutional repositories are still in development; this study may help to guide their implementation and further development.
AB - Identifying the critical success factors (CSFs) of institutional repositories can influence their successful implementation. This study investigates the perceived importance of the success factors and the actual performance of institutional repositories worldwide. A web-based questionnaire was distributed to 354 repository managers via the OpenDOAR email distribution service and achieved a response rate of 83.3%. Factor analysis indicated the possibility of 46 variables under six factors being important for the success of institutional repository implementation. The six factors are Management, Services, Technology, Self-archive practices, People, and Resources. A gap analysis was conducted to identify the importance and actual performance of the factors. The major finding was that several of the factors are not fully realised by the institutional repositories despite their relative importance. Institutional repositories are still in development; this study may help to guide their implementation and further development.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930576504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.007
DO - 10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84930576504
SN - 0740-8188
VL - 37
SP - 147
EP - 155
JO - Library and Information Science Research
JF - Library and Information Science Research
IS - 2
ER -