Measuring perioperative outcome

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleOtherpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review: Measuring clinically relevant and patient-centered perioperative outcomes provides the knowledge that enables clinicians to optimize their practice and guide shared decision-making, researchers to set a future agenda and policymakers to prioritize healthcare spending. Recent findings: A large international collaboration is currently working to define a set of core outcomes for use in perioperative medicine research. Standardizing which outcomes are measured and how they are defined will help ensure that perioperative research output is meaningful and practice changing. The ability to pool nonheterogeneous data from multiple clinical trials will also improve ability of research to provide definitive answers and improve the cost-effectiveness of research spending. Summary: Future clinical trials in perioperative medicine should utilize clearly defined, validated and standardized patient-centered outcome measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)733-738
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Core outcome set
  • Patient-centered outcomes
  • Perioperative medicine
  • Quality of recovery
  • Standardized endpoints

Cite this

@article{b034daf3045140b4a1a7ba737a487322,
title = "Measuring perioperative outcome",
abstract = "Purpose of review: Measuring clinically relevant and patient-centered perioperative outcomes provides the knowledge that enables clinicians to optimize their practice and guide shared decision-making, researchers to set a future agenda and policymakers to prioritize healthcare spending. Recent findings: A large international collaboration is currently working to define a set of core outcomes for use in perioperative medicine research. Standardizing which outcomes are measured and how they are defined will help ensure that perioperative research output is meaningful and practice changing. The ability to pool nonheterogeneous data from multiple clinical trials will also improve ability of research to provide definitive answers and improve the cost-effectiveness of research spending. Summary: Future clinical trials in perioperative medicine should utilize clearly defined, validated and standardized patient-centered outcome measures.",
keywords = "Clinical trials, Core outcome set, Patient-centered outcomes, Perioperative medicine, Quality of recovery, Standardized endpoints",
author = "Mark Shulman and Paul Myles",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1097/ACO.0000000000000383",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "733--738",
journal = "Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology",
issn = "0952-7907",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

Measuring perioperative outcome. / Shulman, Mark; Myles, Paul.

In: Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, Vol. 29, No. 6, 28.11.2016, p. 733-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring perioperative outcome

AU - Shulman, Mark

AU - Myles, Paul

PY - 2016/11/28

Y1 - 2016/11/28

N2 - Purpose of review: Measuring clinically relevant and patient-centered perioperative outcomes provides the knowledge that enables clinicians to optimize their practice and guide shared decision-making, researchers to set a future agenda and policymakers to prioritize healthcare spending. Recent findings: A large international collaboration is currently working to define a set of core outcomes for use in perioperative medicine research. Standardizing which outcomes are measured and how they are defined will help ensure that perioperative research output is meaningful and practice changing. The ability to pool nonheterogeneous data from multiple clinical trials will also improve ability of research to provide definitive answers and improve the cost-effectiveness of research spending. Summary: Future clinical trials in perioperative medicine should utilize clearly defined, validated and standardized patient-centered outcome measures.

AB - Purpose of review: Measuring clinically relevant and patient-centered perioperative outcomes provides the knowledge that enables clinicians to optimize their practice and guide shared decision-making, researchers to set a future agenda and policymakers to prioritize healthcare spending. Recent findings: A large international collaboration is currently working to define a set of core outcomes for use in perioperative medicine research. Standardizing which outcomes are measured and how they are defined will help ensure that perioperative research output is meaningful and practice changing. The ability to pool nonheterogeneous data from multiple clinical trials will also improve ability of research to provide definitive answers and improve the cost-effectiveness of research spending. Summary: Future clinical trials in perioperative medicine should utilize clearly defined, validated and standardized patient-centered outcome measures.

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Core outcome set

KW - Patient-centered outcomes

KW - Perioperative medicine

KW - Quality of recovery

KW - Standardized endpoints

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980012052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000383

DO - 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000383

M3 - Review Article

VL - 29

SP - 733

EP - 738

JO - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

JF - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

SN - 0952-7907

IS - 6

ER -