Target 16.7 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) refers to the need for ‘responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making’ to facilitate just, peaceful and inclusive societies. This chapter discusses why it is important that security and justice institutions, and decision-making therein, are responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative; how to develop such institutions; and how to measure success in this regard. It is argued that the limited scope of the ofﬁcial SDG indicators used to measure progress risks action being taken on less tangible and less measurable but often more meaningful aspects of building just, peaceful and inclusive soci- eties. The chapter argues that facilitating more inclusive decision-making, especially in the security and justice sector (redistributing power), and evaluating progress in this regard (determining what success looks like) are both highly political undertakings. These undertakings are thus, fraught with practical difﬁculties and likely to generate resistance from those who have a vested interest in retaining the status quo. Retaining focus on the Target and overarching Goal, however, can help avoid implementation being derailed by being distracted by a huge data gathering exercise to respond to a narrow set of quantiﬁable indicators. It can also ultimately help facilitate trans- formational change towards just, peaceful and inclusive societies.
|Title of host publication||The Emerald Handbook of Crime, Justice and Sustainable Development|
|Editors||Jarrett Blaustein, Kate Fitz-Gibbon, Nathan W. Pino, Rob White|
|Place of Publication||Bingley UK|
|Publisher||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Number of pages||30|
|ISBN (Electronic)||9781787693555, 9781787693579|
|Publication status||Published - 2021|