Measuring nanometre-scale electric fields in scanning transmission electron microscopy using segmented detectors

H G Brown, Naoya Shibata, Hirokazu Sasaki, T C Petersen, D M Paganin, M J Morgan, S D Findlay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electric field mapping using segmented detectors in the scanning transmission electron microscope has recently been achieved at the nanometre scale. However, converting these results to quantitative field measurements involves assumptions whose validity is unclear for thick specimens. We consider three approaches to quantitative reconstruction of the projected electric potential using segmented detectors: a segmented detector approximation to differential phase contrast and two variants on ptychographical reconstruction. Limitations to these approaches are also studied, particularly errors arising from detector segment size, inelastic scattering, and non-periodic boundary conditions. A simple calibration experiment is described which corrects the differential phase contrast reconstruction to give reliable quantitative results despite the finite detector segment size and the effects of plasmon scattering in thick specimens. A plasmon scattering correction to the segmented detector ptychography approaches is also given. Avoiding the imposition of periodic boundary conditions on the reconstructed projected electric potential leads to more realistic reconstructions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-178
Number of pages10
JournalUltramicroscopy
Volume182
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Differential phase contrast (DPC) imaging
  • Electric fields
  • p-n junctions
  • Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM)

Cite this

@article{ab7c8c9ccb5f4723a427cf366c4e9365,
title = "Measuring nanometre-scale electric fields in scanning transmission electron microscopy using segmented detectors",
abstract = "Electric field mapping using segmented detectors in the scanning transmission electron microscope has recently been achieved at the nanometre scale. However, converting these results to quantitative field measurements involves assumptions whose validity is unclear for thick specimens. We consider three approaches to quantitative reconstruction of the projected electric potential using segmented detectors: a segmented detector approximation to differential phase contrast and two variants on ptychographical reconstruction. Limitations to these approaches are also studied, particularly errors arising from detector segment size, inelastic scattering, and non-periodic boundary conditions. A simple calibration experiment is described which corrects the differential phase contrast reconstruction to give reliable quantitative results despite the finite detector segment size and the effects of plasmon scattering in thick specimens. A plasmon scattering correction to the segmented detector ptychography approaches is also given. Avoiding the imposition of periodic boundary conditions on the reconstructed projected electric potential leads to more realistic reconstructions.",
keywords = "Differential phase contrast (DPC) imaging, Electric fields, p-n junctions, Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM)",
author = "Brown, {H G} and Naoya Shibata and Hirokazu Sasaki and Petersen, {T C} and Paganin, {D M} and Morgan, {M J} and Findlay, {S D}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.07.002",
language = "English",
volume = "182",
pages = "169--178",
journal = "Ultramicroscopy",
issn = "0304-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Measuring nanometre-scale electric fields in scanning transmission electron microscopy using segmented detectors. / Brown, H G; Shibata, Naoya; Sasaki, Hirokazu; Petersen, T C; Paganin, D M; Morgan, M J; Findlay, S D.

In: Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 182, 01.11.2017, p. 169-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring nanometre-scale electric fields in scanning transmission electron microscopy using segmented detectors

AU - Brown, H G

AU - Shibata, Naoya

AU - Sasaki, Hirokazu

AU - Petersen, T C

AU - Paganin, D M

AU - Morgan, M J

AU - Findlay, S D

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Electric field mapping using segmented detectors in the scanning transmission electron microscope has recently been achieved at the nanometre scale. However, converting these results to quantitative field measurements involves assumptions whose validity is unclear for thick specimens. We consider three approaches to quantitative reconstruction of the projected electric potential using segmented detectors: a segmented detector approximation to differential phase contrast and two variants on ptychographical reconstruction. Limitations to these approaches are also studied, particularly errors arising from detector segment size, inelastic scattering, and non-periodic boundary conditions. A simple calibration experiment is described which corrects the differential phase contrast reconstruction to give reliable quantitative results despite the finite detector segment size and the effects of plasmon scattering in thick specimens. A plasmon scattering correction to the segmented detector ptychography approaches is also given. Avoiding the imposition of periodic boundary conditions on the reconstructed projected electric potential leads to more realistic reconstructions.

AB - Electric field mapping using segmented detectors in the scanning transmission electron microscope has recently been achieved at the nanometre scale. However, converting these results to quantitative field measurements involves assumptions whose validity is unclear for thick specimens. We consider three approaches to quantitative reconstruction of the projected electric potential using segmented detectors: a segmented detector approximation to differential phase contrast and two variants on ptychographical reconstruction. Limitations to these approaches are also studied, particularly errors arising from detector segment size, inelastic scattering, and non-periodic boundary conditions. A simple calibration experiment is described which corrects the differential phase contrast reconstruction to give reliable quantitative results despite the finite detector segment size and the effects of plasmon scattering in thick specimens. A plasmon scattering correction to the segmented detector ptychography approaches is also given. Avoiding the imposition of periodic boundary conditions on the reconstructed projected electric potential leads to more realistic reconstructions.

KW - Differential phase contrast (DPC) imaging

KW - Electric fields

KW - p-n junctions

KW - Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022000972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.07.002

M3 - Article

VL - 182

SP - 169

EP - 178

JO - Ultramicroscopy

JF - Ultramicroscopy

SN - 0304-3991

ER -