Measuring impacts of continuing professional development (CPD): the development of the CPD impacts survey (CPDIS)

Introduction: Evaluating continuing professional development (CPD) programs is essential to demonstrate their value to participants and their institutions, and to inform the improvement and quality of CPD programs. Existing surveys measure a narrow range of impacts. This study developed a survey that can measure a broad range of impacts of CPD programs, not just those that are easily measured such as knowledge, skills, attitudes and confidence. Method: The development of the CPD Impacts Survey (CPDIS) was informed by best practice guidelines. A systematic scoping review, qualitative interviews, and existing survey instruments were used to develop the initial survey items. Past participants from two international health professions education institutes completed the survey (n = 292). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to refine the survey. Results: The PCA provided a three-component solution. Component 1 (learnings and self-efficacy), Component 2 (networking and building community), and Component 3 (achievement and validation) comprising 47, 14, and 13 items, respectively. The three components had high internal consistency (α =.98, α =.95, α =.92, respectively). Conclusion: The CPDIS is the first survey to assess a broader range of impacts of CPD programs. Given the substantial financial and opportunity costs of participation in CPD, the CPDIS will allow more efficient and accurate evaluation of the utility and value of CPD programs.