Measuring empathy in undergraduate law students: examining the factorial validity of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Law Students (JSE-LS)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Several scholars have hypothesised a link between empathy and a range of important outcomes for law students including well-being, mental health and the development of effective client-lawyer relationships. However, few studies have examined these claims empirically. Empirical investigation of empathy among law students requires effective methods of measuring empathy. The present study sought to examine an instrument designed specifically to measure empathy among law students – the Jefferson Empathy Scale - Law Students (JSE-LS). The study involved examining the internal consistency and factor structure of the instrument using a sample of 276 Australian undergraduate law students. The study found that a four-factor solution was optimal for the dataset. Two of the factors were readily interpretable with previous literature, however the remaining two factors were unstable, suggesting the need for further revision of the instrument. Recommendations for revising the JSE-LS to better measure empathy are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-149
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volume58
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Keywords

  • Empathy
  • Legal education
  • Legal training
  • MEASUREMENT
  • Mental health
  • psychometrics
  • Student wellbeing

Cite this

@article{905093efaf8146aeae52bfd38a3475b8,
title = "Measuring empathy in undergraduate law students: examining the factorial validity of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Law Students (JSE-LS)",
abstract = "Several scholars have hypothesised a link between empathy and a range of important outcomes for law students including well-being, mental health and the development of effective client-lawyer relationships. However, few studies have examined these claims empirically. Empirical investigation of empathy among law students requires effective methods of measuring empathy. The present study sought to examine an instrument designed specifically to measure empathy among law students – the Jefferson Empathy Scale - Law Students (JSE-LS). The study involved examining the internal consistency and factor structure of the instrument using a sample of 276 Australian undergraduate law students. The study found that a four-factor solution was optimal for the dataset. Two of the factors were readily interpretable with previous literature, however the remaining two factors were unstable, suggesting the need for further revision of the instrument. Recommendations for revising the JSE-LS to better measure empathy are discussed.",
keywords = "Empathy, Legal education, Legal training, MEASUREMENT, Mental health, psychometrics, Student wellbeing",
author = "Benjamin Spivak and Becky Batagol and Adiva Sifris and Brett Williams",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.01.009",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "143--149",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-2527",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring empathy in undergraduate law students

T2 - examining the factorial validity of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Law Students (JSE-LS)

AU - Spivak, Benjamin

AU - Batagol, Becky

AU - Sifris, Adiva

AU - Williams, Brett

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Several scholars have hypothesised a link between empathy and a range of important outcomes for law students including well-being, mental health and the development of effective client-lawyer relationships. However, few studies have examined these claims empirically. Empirical investigation of empathy among law students requires effective methods of measuring empathy. The present study sought to examine an instrument designed specifically to measure empathy among law students – the Jefferson Empathy Scale - Law Students (JSE-LS). The study involved examining the internal consistency and factor structure of the instrument using a sample of 276 Australian undergraduate law students. The study found that a four-factor solution was optimal for the dataset. Two of the factors were readily interpretable with previous literature, however the remaining two factors were unstable, suggesting the need for further revision of the instrument. Recommendations for revising the JSE-LS to better measure empathy are discussed.

AB - Several scholars have hypothesised a link between empathy and a range of important outcomes for law students including well-being, mental health and the development of effective client-lawyer relationships. However, few studies have examined these claims empirically. Empirical investigation of empathy among law students requires effective methods of measuring empathy. The present study sought to examine an instrument designed specifically to measure empathy among law students – the Jefferson Empathy Scale - Law Students (JSE-LS). The study involved examining the internal consistency and factor structure of the instrument using a sample of 276 Australian undergraduate law students. The study found that a four-factor solution was optimal for the dataset. Two of the factors were readily interpretable with previous literature, however the remaining two factors were unstable, suggesting the need for further revision of the instrument. Recommendations for revising the JSE-LS to better measure empathy are discussed.

KW - Empathy

KW - Legal education

KW - Legal training

KW - MEASUREMENT

KW - Mental health

KW - psychometrics

KW - Student wellbeing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046086469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.01.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.01.009

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 143

EP - 149

JO - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

SN - 0160-2527

ER -