Measurements of ankle dorsiflexion in stroke subjects obtained using standardised dorsiflexion force

Jennifer L. Keating, Claire Parks, Merilyn Mackenzie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the reliability of measurements of ankle dorsiflexion obtained using the Lidcombe Template, an instrument that allows the magnitude and direction of force applied to dorsiflex the foot to be measured and standardised. Ten unimpaired physiotherapy students and 21 subjects who had suffered stroke were tested twice. Twenty minutes separated tests. Measurements of passive dorsiflexion range were highly reliable for both groups (r>0.92) when the mean of three measurements was used. Significantly more variability occurred in measurements of impaired subjects than unimpaired subjects. For the subjects tested, for 95 per cent confidence that real differences exist between measurements taken 20 minutes apart, 7 degrees and 3 degrees must be allowed around measurements of impaired and unimpaired subjects respectively. These small error margins confer confidence in the potential utility of this instrument for measuring ankle dorsiflexion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-213
Number of pages11
JournalAustralian Journal of Physiotherapy
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000

Keywords

  • Ankle
  • Range of motion
  • Reproducibility of results
  • Research design

Cite this

@article{e11f8dcf85954a71afbe41247d20d8f1,
title = "Measurements of ankle dorsiflexion in stroke subjects obtained using standardised dorsiflexion force",
abstract = "This study investigated the reliability of measurements of ankle dorsiflexion obtained using the Lidcombe Template, an instrument that allows the magnitude and direction of force applied to dorsiflex the foot to be measured and standardised. Ten unimpaired physiotherapy students and 21 subjects who had suffered stroke were tested twice. Twenty minutes separated tests. Measurements of passive dorsiflexion range were highly reliable for both groups (r>0.92) when the mean of three measurements was used. Significantly more variability occurred in measurements of impaired subjects than unimpaired subjects. For the subjects tested, for 95 per cent confidence that real differences exist between measurements taken 20 minutes apart, 7 degrees and 3 degrees must be allowed around measurements of impaired and unimpaired subjects respectively. These small error margins confer confidence in the potential utility of this instrument for measuring ankle dorsiflexion.",
keywords = "Ankle, Range of motion, Reproducibility of results, Research design",
author = "Keating, {Jennifer L.} and Claire Parks and Merilyn Mackenzie",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60329-9",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "203--213",
journal = "Australian Journal of Physiotherapy",
issn = "0004-9514",
number = "3",

}

Measurements of ankle dorsiflexion in stroke subjects obtained using standardised dorsiflexion force. / Keating, Jennifer L.; Parks, Claire; Mackenzie, Merilyn.

In: Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, Vol. 46, No. 3, 01.01.2000, p. 203-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurements of ankle dorsiflexion in stroke subjects obtained using standardised dorsiflexion force

AU - Keating, Jennifer L.

AU - Parks, Claire

AU - Mackenzie, Merilyn

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - This study investigated the reliability of measurements of ankle dorsiflexion obtained using the Lidcombe Template, an instrument that allows the magnitude and direction of force applied to dorsiflex the foot to be measured and standardised. Ten unimpaired physiotherapy students and 21 subjects who had suffered stroke were tested twice. Twenty minutes separated tests. Measurements of passive dorsiflexion range were highly reliable for both groups (r>0.92) when the mean of three measurements was used. Significantly more variability occurred in measurements of impaired subjects than unimpaired subjects. For the subjects tested, for 95 per cent confidence that real differences exist between measurements taken 20 minutes apart, 7 degrees and 3 degrees must be allowed around measurements of impaired and unimpaired subjects respectively. These small error margins confer confidence in the potential utility of this instrument for measuring ankle dorsiflexion.

AB - This study investigated the reliability of measurements of ankle dorsiflexion obtained using the Lidcombe Template, an instrument that allows the magnitude and direction of force applied to dorsiflex the foot to be measured and standardised. Ten unimpaired physiotherapy students and 21 subjects who had suffered stroke were tested twice. Twenty minutes separated tests. Measurements of passive dorsiflexion range were highly reliable for both groups (r>0.92) when the mean of three measurements was used. Significantly more variability occurred in measurements of impaired subjects than unimpaired subjects. For the subjects tested, for 95 per cent confidence that real differences exist between measurements taken 20 minutes apart, 7 degrees and 3 degrees must be allowed around measurements of impaired and unimpaired subjects respectively. These small error margins confer confidence in the potential utility of this instrument for measuring ankle dorsiflexion.

KW - Ankle

KW - Range of motion

KW - Reproducibility of results

KW - Research design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033812770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60329-9

DO - 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60329-9

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 203

EP - 213

JO - Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

JF - Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

SN - 0004-9514

IS - 3

ER -