TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement properties of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for evaluating functional status after inpatient surgery
AU - Daza, Julian F.
AU - Cuthbertson, Brian H.
AU - Myles, Paul S.
AU - Shulman, Mark A.
AU - Wijeysundera, Duminda N.
AU - on behalf of the 6MWT-METS Substudy Investigators
N1 - Funding Information:
J.F.D. is supported by research scholarships from the American College of Surgeons, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Division of General Surgery at the University of Toronto. B.H.C. and D.N.W. are supported, in part, by Merit Awards from the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine at the University of Toronto. D.N.W. is supported, in part, by the Endowed Chair in Translational Anesthesiology Research at St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto. P.S.M. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Practitioner Fellowship grant. The METS study was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science; United Kingdom (UK) National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia; UK Clinical Research Collaboration; Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists; and Monash University (Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s).
PY - 2022/10/1
Y1 - 2022/10/1
N2 - Background: Expert recommendations propose the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 as a core outcome measure in surgical studies, yet data on its long-term measurement properties remain limited. These were evaluated in a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) prospective cohort. Methods: Participants were adults (40 years of age or older) who underwent inpatient non-cardiac surgery. The 12-item WHODAS and EQ-5DTM-3L questionnaires were administered preoperatively (in person) and 1 year postoperatively (by telephone). Responsiveness was characterized using standardized response means (SRMs) and correlation coefficients between change scores. Construct validity was evaluated using correlation coefficients between 1-year scores and comparisons of WHODAS scores across clinically relevant subgroups. Results: The analysis included 546 patients. There was moderate correlation between changes in WHODAS and various EQ-5DTM subscales. The strongest correlation was between changes in WHODAS and changes in the functional domains of the EQ-5D-3L - for example, mobility (Spearman's rho 0.40, 95 per cent confidence interval [c.i.] 0.32 to 0.48) and usual activities (rho 0.45, 95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.52). When compared across quartiles of EQ-5D index change, median WHODAS scores followed expected patterns of change. In subgroups with expected functional status changes, the WHODAS SRMs ranged from 'small' to 'large' in the expected directions of change. At 1 year, the WHODAS demonstrated convergence with the EQ-5D-3L functional domains, and good discrimination between patients with expected differences in functional status. Conclusion: The WHODAS questionnaire has construct validity and responsiveness as a measure of functional status at 1 year after major surgery.
AB - Background: Expert recommendations propose the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 as a core outcome measure in surgical studies, yet data on its long-term measurement properties remain limited. These were evaluated in a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) prospective cohort. Methods: Participants were adults (40 years of age or older) who underwent inpatient non-cardiac surgery. The 12-item WHODAS and EQ-5DTM-3L questionnaires were administered preoperatively (in person) and 1 year postoperatively (by telephone). Responsiveness was characterized using standardized response means (SRMs) and correlation coefficients between change scores. Construct validity was evaluated using correlation coefficients between 1-year scores and comparisons of WHODAS scores across clinically relevant subgroups. Results: The analysis included 546 patients. There was moderate correlation between changes in WHODAS and various EQ-5DTM subscales. The strongest correlation was between changes in WHODAS and changes in the functional domains of the EQ-5D-3L - for example, mobility (Spearman's rho 0.40, 95 per cent confidence interval [c.i.] 0.32 to 0.48) and usual activities (rho 0.45, 95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.52). When compared across quartiles of EQ-5D index change, median WHODAS scores followed expected patterns of change. In subgroups with expected functional status changes, the WHODAS SRMs ranged from 'small' to 'large' in the expected directions of change. At 1 year, the WHODAS demonstrated convergence with the EQ-5D-3L functional domains, and good discrimination between patients with expected differences in functional status. Conclusion: The WHODAS questionnaire has construct validity and responsiveness as a measure of functional status at 1 year after major surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145475982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/bjs/znac263
DO - 10.1093/bjs/znac263
M3 - Article
C2 - 5929065
AN - SCOPUS:85145475982
SN - 0007-1323
VL - 109
SP - 968
EP - 976
JO - British Journal of Surgery
JF - British Journal of Surgery
IS - 10
ER -