TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement properties of a modified Reintegration to Normal Living Index in a community-dwelling adult rehabilitation population
AU - Miller, Alison
AU - Clemson, Lindy
AU - Lannin, Natasha
PY - 2011/10/11
Y1 - 2011/10/11
N2 - Purpose.To examine the validity and reliability of a modified Reintegration to Normal Living Index (mRNL Index) with a sample of community-dwelling adults with mixed diagnoses. Method.Forty-six adults (mean 55.2±20.3 years) were recruited through convenience sampling from outpatient rehabilitation services. They completed the mRNL Index, Community Integration Measure (CIM) and Life Space Assessment (LSA) and were invited to complete them again 2 weeks later. Results.Construct validity of the mRNL Index was confirmed by good fit to the Rasch measurement model. The mRNL Index demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.80), as did the Daily Functioning subscale (Cronbach's α=0.80) and Personal Integration subscale (Cronbach's α=0.82). Test-retest reliability was also acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient (3,1)=0.83, p=.0001). As hypothesised, the LSA did not correlate with the Personal Integration subscale (Spearman rho=0.08) and moderately correlated to the Daily Functioning subscale (Spearman rho=0.59). The CIM was moderately correlated with the Personal Integration subscales (Spearman rho=0.54) and the Daily Functioning subscale (Spearman rho=0.53), though higher correlation was expected with the latter. Conclusion.Modifications to the phrasing, rating scale and subscales improved the validity of the original RNL Index for a mixed rehabilitation, community-dwelling population.
AB - Purpose.To examine the validity and reliability of a modified Reintegration to Normal Living Index (mRNL Index) with a sample of community-dwelling adults with mixed diagnoses. Method.Forty-six adults (mean 55.2±20.3 years) were recruited through convenience sampling from outpatient rehabilitation services. They completed the mRNL Index, Community Integration Measure (CIM) and Life Space Assessment (LSA) and were invited to complete them again 2 weeks later. Results.Construct validity of the mRNL Index was confirmed by good fit to the Rasch measurement model. The mRNL Index demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.80), as did the Daily Functioning subscale (Cronbach's α=0.80) and Personal Integration subscale (Cronbach's α=0.82). Test-retest reliability was also acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient (3,1)=0.83, p=.0001). As hypothesised, the LSA did not correlate with the Personal Integration subscale (Spearman rho=0.08) and moderately correlated to the Daily Functioning subscale (Spearman rho=0.59). The CIM was moderately correlated with the Personal Integration subscales (Spearman rho=0.54) and the Daily Functioning subscale (Spearman rho=0.53), though higher correlation was expected with the latter. Conclusion.Modifications to the phrasing, rating scale and subscales improved the validity of the original RNL Index for a mixed rehabilitation, community-dwelling population.
KW - Participation
KW - Patient discharge
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNL)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053556671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/09638288.2011.553707
DO - 10.3109/09638288.2011.553707
M3 - Article
C2 - 21306195
AN - SCOPUS:80053556671
SN - 0963-8288
VL - 33
SP - 1968
EP - 1978
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
IS - 21-22
ER -