Maximising health versus sharing: Measuring preferences for the allocation of the health budget

Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson, Kompal Sinha, Angelo Anthony Iezzi, Aimee Maxwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Empirical evidence indicates that people consider sharing health resources to be important even in the absence of the attributes usually associated with equity (age, social class, ethnicity, disease severity or geographic location). If government is to take account of these preferences then survey methods are needed which allow their measurement. The present paper presents a new technique for measuring these preferences and reports the results of a representative survey of 626 Australians which employed the technique. The online and postal survey did not include any of the attributes usually associated with equity but was designed to quantify the respective importance of sharing life years (outcome egalitarianism), resource sharing per se and the changing importance of total health as other attributes varied. Results indicate respondents were primarily concerned with outcome egalitarianism, and that cost per life year had a relatively small effect upon their allocative decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1351 - 1361
Number of pages11
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume75
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this

Richardson, Jeffrey Ralph James ; Sinha, Kompal ; Iezzi, Angelo Anthony ; Maxwell, Aimee. / Maximising health versus sharing: Measuring preferences for the allocation of the health budget. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 75, No. 8. pp. 1351 - 1361.
@article{786fe5370a754f47a1a2056ea2c02e6f,
title = "Maximising health versus sharing: Measuring preferences for the allocation of the health budget",
abstract = "Empirical evidence indicates that people consider sharing health resources to be important even in the absence of the attributes usually associated with equity (age, social class, ethnicity, disease severity or geographic location). If government is to take account of these preferences then survey methods are needed which allow their measurement. The present paper presents a new technique for measuring these preferences and reports the results of a representative survey of 626 Australians which employed the technique. The online and postal survey did not include any of the attributes usually associated with equity but was designed to quantify the respective importance of sharing life years (outcome egalitarianism), resource sharing per se and the changing importance of total health as other attributes varied. Results indicate respondents were primarily concerned with outcome egalitarianism, and that cost per life year had a relatively small effect upon their allocative decisions.",
author = "Richardson, {Jeffrey Ralph James} and Kompal Sinha and Iezzi, {Angelo Anthony} and Aimee Maxwell",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.036",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "1351 -- 1361",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Pergamon",
number = "8",

}

Maximising health versus sharing: Measuring preferences for the allocation of the health budget. / Richardson, Jeffrey Ralph James; Sinha, Kompal; Iezzi, Angelo Anthony; Maxwell, Aimee.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 75, No. 8, 2012, p. 1351 - 1361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maximising health versus sharing: Measuring preferences for the allocation of the health budget

AU - Richardson, Jeffrey Ralph James

AU - Sinha, Kompal

AU - Iezzi, Angelo Anthony

AU - Maxwell, Aimee

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Empirical evidence indicates that people consider sharing health resources to be important even in the absence of the attributes usually associated with equity (age, social class, ethnicity, disease severity or geographic location). If government is to take account of these preferences then survey methods are needed which allow their measurement. The present paper presents a new technique for measuring these preferences and reports the results of a representative survey of 626 Australians which employed the technique. The online and postal survey did not include any of the attributes usually associated with equity but was designed to quantify the respective importance of sharing life years (outcome egalitarianism), resource sharing per se and the changing importance of total health as other attributes varied. Results indicate respondents were primarily concerned with outcome egalitarianism, and that cost per life year had a relatively small effect upon their allocative decisions.

AB - Empirical evidence indicates that people consider sharing health resources to be important even in the absence of the attributes usually associated with equity (age, social class, ethnicity, disease severity or geographic location). If government is to take account of these preferences then survey methods are needed which allow their measurement. The present paper presents a new technique for measuring these preferences and reports the results of a representative survey of 626 Australians which employed the technique. The online and postal survey did not include any of the attributes usually associated with equity but was designed to quantify the respective importance of sharing life years (outcome egalitarianism), resource sharing per se and the changing importance of total health as other attributes varied. Results indicate respondents were primarily concerned with outcome egalitarianism, and that cost per life year had a relatively small effect upon their allocative decisions.

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.036

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.036

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 1351

EP - 1361

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 8

ER -