Maternity care providers and complementary and integrative medicine

Amie Steel, Abigail Aiyepola, Jane Frawley, Helen Hall

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Otherpeer-review

Abstract

These decisions may include the use of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) for general health during pregnancy as well as pregnancy-related health complaints. While the Davis-Floyd model does not link specific paradigms to any one health profession, in this chapter explores the evidence underpinning any such relationships. The chapter focuses on obstetricians and midwives, and examining the potential role of these conventional health care providers in women's use of CIM during pregnancy, labour and birth. A study of a large, nationally representative sample of Australian women who had recently given birth was published in 2012 and provided the first examination of consultancy patterns across conventional maternity care providers and CIM practitioners during pregnancy. This finding supports previous research identifying midwives as a popular source of CIM information for pregnant women and often encouraging CIM use for women in their care. The study findings illustrate the inconsistent relationship between the available clinical evidence and the CIM practitioners used by pregnant women.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWomen’s Health and Complementary and Integrative Medicine
EditorsJon Adams, Amie Steel, Alex Broom, Jane Frawley
Place of PublicationAbingdon UK
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter9
Pages128-141
Number of pages14
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781315660721
ISBN (Print)9781138959262
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this