Mary Astell’s critique of Pierre Bayle

atheism and intellectual integrity in the Pensées (1682)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper focuses on the English philosopher Mary Astell’s marginalia in Lady Mary Wortley Montagu’s personal copy of the 1704 edition of Pierre Bayle’s Pensées diverses sur le comète (first published in 1682). I argue that Astell’s annotations provide good reasons for thinking that Bayle is biased towards atheism in this work. Recent scholars maintain that Bayle can be interpreted as an Academic Sceptic: as someone who honestly and impartially follows a dialectical method of argument in order to obtain the goal of intellectual integrity. In her commentary, however, Astell suggests that: (i) if Bayle were honest and impartial in his inquiries, then he would not have pretended to attack popular superstition, only to undermine generally-held religious beliefs; and (ii) if Bayle valued intellectual integrity, then his argument for a society of virtuous atheists would not have relied upon a deceptive equivocation in terms. I conclude that the rediscovery of this marginalia is valuable for enhancing our appreciation of Astell as an astute reader of one of her most enigmatic contemporaries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)806-823
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Mary Astell
  • academic scepticism
  • Pierre Bayle
  • intellectual integrity
  • atheism

Cite this

@article{149f6f7b562f4963a6d9a71eeb3344c0,
title = "Mary Astell’s critique of Pierre Bayle: atheism and intellectual integrity in the Pens{\'e}es (1682)",
abstract = "This paper focuses on the English philosopher Mary Astell’s marginalia in Lady Mary Wortley Montagu’s personal copy of the 1704 edition of Pierre Bayle’s Pens{\'e}es diverses sur le com{\`e}te (first published in 1682). I argue that Astell’s annotations provide good reasons for thinking that Bayle is biased towards atheism in this work. Recent scholars maintain that Bayle can be interpreted as an Academic Sceptic: as someone who honestly and impartially follows a dialectical method of argument in order to obtain the goal of intellectual integrity. In her commentary, however, Astell suggests that: (i) if Bayle were honest and impartial in his inquiries, then he would not have pretended to attack popular superstition, only to undermine generally-held religious beliefs; and (ii) if Bayle valued intellectual integrity, then his argument for a society of virtuous atheists would not have relied upon a deceptive equivocation in terms. I conclude that the rediscovery of this marginalia is valuable for enhancing our appreciation of Astell as an astute reader of one of her most enigmatic contemporaries.",
keywords = "Mary Astell, academic scepticism, Pierre Bayle, intellectual integrity, atheism",
author = "Broad, {Jacqueline Sonia}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/09608788.2018.1506316",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "806--823",
journal = "British Journal for the History of Philosophy",
issn = "0960-8788",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Mary Astell’s critique of Pierre Bayle : atheism and intellectual integrity in the Pensées (1682). / Broad, Jacqueline Sonia.

In: British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2019, p. 806-823.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mary Astell’s critique of Pierre Bayle

T2 - atheism and intellectual integrity in the Pensées (1682)

AU - Broad, Jacqueline Sonia

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This paper focuses on the English philosopher Mary Astell’s marginalia in Lady Mary Wortley Montagu’s personal copy of the 1704 edition of Pierre Bayle’s Pensées diverses sur le comète (first published in 1682). I argue that Astell’s annotations provide good reasons for thinking that Bayle is biased towards atheism in this work. Recent scholars maintain that Bayle can be interpreted as an Academic Sceptic: as someone who honestly and impartially follows a dialectical method of argument in order to obtain the goal of intellectual integrity. In her commentary, however, Astell suggests that: (i) if Bayle were honest and impartial in his inquiries, then he would not have pretended to attack popular superstition, only to undermine generally-held religious beliefs; and (ii) if Bayle valued intellectual integrity, then his argument for a society of virtuous atheists would not have relied upon a deceptive equivocation in terms. I conclude that the rediscovery of this marginalia is valuable for enhancing our appreciation of Astell as an astute reader of one of her most enigmatic contemporaries.

AB - This paper focuses on the English philosopher Mary Astell’s marginalia in Lady Mary Wortley Montagu’s personal copy of the 1704 edition of Pierre Bayle’s Pensées diverses sur le comète (first published in 1682). I argue that Astell’s annotations provide good reasons for thinking that Bayle is biased towards atheism in this work. Recent scholars maintain that Bayle can be interpreted as an Academic Sceptic: as someone who honestly and impartially follows a dialectical method of argument in order to obtain the goal of intellectual integrity. In her commentary, however, Astell suggests that: (i) if Bayle were honest and impartial in his inquiries, then he would not have pretended to attack popular superstition, only to undermine generally-held religious beliefs; and (ii) if Bayle valued intellectual integrity, then his argument for a society of virtuous atheists would not have relied upon a deceptive equivocation in terms. I conclude that the rediscovery of this marginalia is valuable for enhancing our appreciation of Astell as an astute reader of one of her most enigmatic contemporaries.

KW - Mary Astell

KW - academic scepticism

KW - Pierre Bayle

KW - intellectual integrity

KW - atheism

U2 - 10.1080/09608788.2018.1506316

DO - 10.1080/09608788.2018.1506316

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 806

EP - 823

JO - British Journal for the History of Philosophy

JF - British Journal for the History of Philosophy

SN - 0960-8788

IS - 4

ER -