Marriage: a human right for all?

Paula Gerber, Kristine Tay, Adiva Sifris

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Otherpeer-review

Abstract

Article 23 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights contains an express right to marry. This article analyses this provision, other United Nations human rights treaties, and relevant jurisprudence to determine whether art 23 applies to same-sex couples. In the only authoritative interpretation of art 23, Joslin v New Zealand, the United Nations Human Rights Committee found that it does not apply to same-sex couples. However, that decision is more than 12 years old and arguably would not be decided in the same way should a similar case come before the Human Rights Committee in the future. Using the principles of treaty interpretation, this article asserts that Joslin v New Zealand is no longer good law, and concludes that the right to marry should be interpreted in a non-discriminatory manner and should not be restricted exclusively to opposite-sex couples. This article also seeks to start a dialogue about the human right to marry’s intersectionality with and indivisibility from other human rights. As such, it suggests new, progressive ways of interpreting the norms of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child as they relate to the human right to marry.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMarital Rights
Subtitle of host publicationThe Library of Essays on Family Rights
Place of PublicationAbingdon UK
PublisherRoutledge
Pages21-45
Number of pages25
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781351559188
ISBN (Print)9781472465740
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Cite this

Gerber, P., Tay, K., & Sifris, A. (2017). Marriage: a human right for all? In Marital Rights: The Library of Essays on Family Rights (1st ed., pp. 21-45). Abingdon UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091464
Gerber, Paula ; Tay, Kristine ; Sifris, Adiva. / Marriage : a human right for all?. Marital Rights: The Library of Essays on Family Rights. 1st. ed. Abingdon UK : Routledge, 2017. pp. 21-45
@inbook{c3786c9ea2454528ad877c9eae65f3bb,
title = "Marriage: a human right for all?",
abstract = "Article 23 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights contains an express right to marry. This article analyses this provision, other United Nations human rights treaties, and relevant jurisprudence to determine whether art 23 applies to same-sex couples. In the only authoritative interpretation of art 23, Joslin v New Zealand, the United Nations Human Rights Committee found that it does not apply to same-sex couples. However, that decision is more than 12 years old and arguably would not be decided in the same way should a similar case come before the Human Rights Committee in the future. Using the principles of treaty interpretation, this article asserts that Joslin v New Zealand is no longer good law, and concludes that the right to marry should be interpreted in a non-discriminatory manner and should not be restricted exclusively to opposite-sex couples. This article also seeks to start a dialogue about the human right to marry’s intersectionality with and indivisibility from other human rights. As such, it suggests new, progressive ways of interpreting the norms of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child as they relate to the human right to marry.",
author = "Paula Gerber and Kristine Tay and Adiva Sifris",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315091464",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781472465740",
pages = "21--45",
booktitle = "Marital Rights",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "1st",

}

Gerber, P, Tay, K & Sifris, A 2017, Marriage: a human right for all? in Marital Rights: The Library of Essays on Family Rights. 1st edn, Routledge, Abingdon UK, pp. 21-45. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091464

Marriage : a human right for all? / Gerber, Paula; Tay, Kristine; Sifris, Adiva.

Marital Rights: The Library of Essays on Family Rights. 1st. ed. Abingdon UK : Routledge, 2017. p. 21-45.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Otherpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Marriage

T2 - a human right for all?

AU - Gerber, Paula

AU - Tay, Kristine

AU - Sifris, Adiva

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Article 23 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights contains an express right to marry. This article analyses this provision, other United Nations human rights treaties, and relevant jurisprudence to determine whether art 23 applies to same-sex couples. In the only authoritative interpretation of art 23, Joslin v New Zealand, the United Nations Human Rights Committee found that it does not apply to same-sex couples. However, that decision is more than 12 years old and arguably would not be decided in the same way should a similar case come before the Human Rights Committee in the future. Using the principles of treaty interpretation, this article asserts that Joslin v New Zealand is no longer good law, and concludes that the right to marry should be interpreted in a non-discriminatory manner and should not be restricted exclusively to opposite-sex couples. This article also seeks to start a dialogue about the human right to marry’s intersectionality with and indivisibility from other human rights. As such, it suggests new, progressive ways of interpreting the norms of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child as they relate to the human right to marry.

AB - Article 23 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights contains an express right to marry. This article analyses this provision, other United Nations human rights treaties, and relevant jurisprudence to determine whether art 23 applies to same-sex couples. In the only authoritative interpretation of art 23, Joslin v New Zealand, the United Nations Human Rights Committee found that it does not apply to same-sex couples. However, that decision is more than 12 years old and arguably would not be decided in the same way should a similar case come before the Human Rights Committee in the future. Using the principles of treaty interpretation, this article asserts that Joslin v New Zealand is no longer good law, and concludes that the right to marry should be interpreted in a non-discriminatory manner and should not be restricted exclusively to opposite-sex couples. This article also seeks to start a dialogue about the human right to marry’s intersectionality with and indivisibility from other human rights. As such, it suggests new, progressive ways of interpreting the norms of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child as they relate to the human right to marry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029040681&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315091464

DO - 10.4324/9781315091464

M3 - Chapter (Book)

SN - 9781472465740

SP - 21

EP - 45

BT - Marital Rights

PB - Routledge

CY - Abingdon UK

ER -

Gerber P, Tay K, Sifris A. Marriage: a human right for all? In Marital Rights: The Library of Essays on Family Rights. 1st ed. Abingdon UK: Routledge. 2017. p. 21-45 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091464