Mandatory sentencing? Use [with] discretion

Kate Warner, Caroline Spiranovic, Arie Freiberg, Julia Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

When asked about sentencing discretion and mandatory sentences, jurors participating in the Victorian Jury Sentencing Study expressed strong support for sentencing discretion and weak support for mandatory sentences despite a belief by jurors that, in general, sentences are too lenient. This strengthens the argument that polls that pose a general question about mandatory sentences or sentencing severity divorced from the context of a specific case are an inadequate and misleading measure of public opinion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-294
Number of pages6
JournalAlternative Law Journal
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Keywords

  • public opinion
  • mandatory sentences
  • sentencing discretion

Cite this

Warner, Kate ; Spiranovic, Caroline ; Freiberg, Arie ; Davis, Julia. / Mandatory sentencing? Use [with] discretion. In: Alternative Law Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 289-294.
@article{5ea49715ba724dddb6d26eb93fb2ec01,
title = "Mandatory sentencing? Use [with] discretion",
abstract = "When asked about sentencing discretion and mandatory sentences, jurors participating in the Victorian Jury Sentencing Study expressed strong support for sentencing discretion and weak support for mandatory sentences despite a belief by jurors that, in general, sentences are too lenient. This strengthens the argument that polls that pose a general question about mandatory sentences or sentencing severity divorced from the context of a specific case are an inadequate and misleading measure of public opinion.",
keywords = "public opinion, mandatory sentences, sentencing discretion",
author = "Kate Warner and Caroline Spiranovic and Arie Freiberg and Julia Davis",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/1037969X18793967",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "289--294",
journal = "Alternative Law Journal",
issn = "1037-969X",
publisher = "Legal Service Bulletin Co-operative Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Mandatory sentencing? Use [with] discretion. / Warner, Kate; Spiranovic, Caroline; Freiberg, Arie; Davis, Julia.

In: Alternative Law Journal, Vol. 43, No. 4, 12.2018, p. 289-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mandatory sentencing? Use [with] discretion

AU - Warner, Kate

AU - Spiranovic, Caroline

AU - Freiberg, Arie

AU - Davis, Julia

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - When asked about sentencing discretion and mandatory sentences, jurors participating in the Victorian Jury Sentencing Study expressed strong support for sentencing discretion and weak support for mandatory sentences despite a belief by jurors that, in general, sentences are too lenient. This strengthens the argument that polls that pose a general question about mandatory sentences or sentencing severity divorced from the context of a specific case are an inadequate and misleading measure of public opinion.

AB - When asked about sentencing discretion and mandatory sentences, jurors participating in the Victorian Jury Sentencing Study expressed strong support for sentencing discretion and weak support for mandatory sentences despite a belief by jurors that, in general, sentences are too lenient. This strengthens the argument that polls that pose a general question about mandatory sentences or sentencing severity divorced from the context of a specific case are an inadequate and misleading measure of public opinion.

KW - public opinion

KW - mandatory sentences

KW - sentencing discretion

U2 - 10.1177/1037969X18793967

DO - 10.1177/1037969X18793967

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 289

EP - 294

JO - Alternative Law Journal

JF - Alternative Law Journal

SN - 1037-969X

IS - 4

ER -