TY - JOUR
T1 - Managing systemic uncertainty
T2 - the role of industry-level management controls and hybrids
AU - Thambar, Paul J.
AU - Brown, David A.
AU - Sivabalan, Prabhu
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - We study how multiple firms voluntarily design inter-firm mechanisms to manage industry-level systemic uncertainty. Facing a threat of systemic uncertainty that cannot be addressed by any one firm, we explain how the Australian cotton industry mobilised hybrids and boundary spanners to develop an industry-level solution at the inter-firm level. We apply resource dependence theory to extend Miller, Kurunmäki and O'Leary (2008), and identify a broader range of hybrid characteristics (novel, inter-firm, public/private and open source) than currently acknowledged in accounting studies. We use these characteristics to explain how hybrid organisational forms and hybrid control processes operate at the inter-firm level to develop and share a solution to systemic uncertainty, which are subsequently applied at the firm-level. Our findings also show how boundary spanners can operate with less tension in larger industry-level collaborations, explained using our resource dependence conceptualisation. This responds to Dekker's (2016) calls for more inter-firm research clarifying how controls operate beyond the firm.
AB - We study how multiple firms voluntarily design inter-firm mechanisms to manage industry-level systemic uncertainty. Facing a threat of systemic uncertainty that cannot be addressed by any one firm, we explain how the Australian cotton industry mobilised hybrids and boundary spanners to develop an industry-level solution at the inter-firm level. We apply resource dependence theory to extend Miller, Kurunmäki and O'Leary (2008), and identify a broader range of hybrid characteristics (novel, inter-firm, public/private and open source) than currently acknowledged in accounting studies. We use these characteristics to explain how hybrid organisational forms and hybrid control processes operate at the inter-firm level to develop and share a solution to systemic uncertainty, which are subsequently applied at the firm-level. Our findings also show how boundary spanners can operate with less tension in larger industry-level collaborations, explained using our resource dependence conceptualisation. This responds to Dekker's (2016) calls for more inter-firm research clarifying how controls operate beyond the firm.
KW - Boundary spanners
KW - Hybrids
KW - Industry-level management controls
KW - Systemic uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063280776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.aos.2019.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.aos.2019.03.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85063280776
SN - 0361-3682
VL - 77
JO - Accounting, Organizations and Society
JF - Accounting, Organizations and Society
M1 - 101049
ER -