Making the abject

problem-solving courts, addiction, mental illness and impairment

Claire Spivakovsky, Kate Seear

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Otherpeer-review

Abstract

The advent of ‘problem-solving courts’ (e.g. drug courts, mental health courts and lists) is claimed by some to represent a significant shift in the administration of justice, through the adoption of a more ‘holistic’ and ‘generous’ approach to offenders. Although there is a large body of research examining the operation and efficacy of such courts, there is minimal critical research on how these courts conceptualise both ‘problems’ and ‘problem populations’, or the various implications thereof. In this chapter, we examine these issues via the theoretical framework of Carol Bacchi. Bacchi argues that policy ‘problems’ do not precede policy interventions, but that ‘problems’ are in fact constituted by and given meaning through implicit policy representations. This chapter extends this work further, considering how two Australian problem-solving courts (Victoria’s drug court and mental health list) conceptualise their target populations and the ‘problems’ they seek to solve in relation to them. The chapter considers how these processes constitute particular subjects (‘addicts’, the ‘disabled’ and the ‘mentally ill’) as abnormal, fixing connections, in the process, between drugs, disability, mental illness, normalcy and crime.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCritical Perspectives on Coercive Interventions
Subtitle of host publicationLaw, Medicine and Society
EditorsClaire Spivanovsky, Kate Seear, Adrian Carter
Place of PublicationAbingdon UK
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter7
Pages119-134
Number of pages16
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781315158693
ISBN (Print)9781138067370
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

Spivakovsky, C., & Seear, K. (2018). Making the abject: problem-solving courts, addiction, mental illness and impairment. In C. Spivanovsky, K. Seear, & A. Carter (Eds.), Critical Perspectives on Coercive Interventions: Law, Medicine and Society (1st ed., pp. 119-134). Abingdon UK: Routledge.
Spivakovsky, Claire ; Seear, Kate. / Making the abject : problem-solving courts, addiction, mental illness and impairment. Critical Perspectives on Coercive Interventions: Law, Medicine and Society. editor / Claire Spivanovsky ; Kate Seear ; Adrian Carter. 1st. ed. Abingdon UK : Routledge, 2018. pp. 119-134
@inbook{d03147afcb1f49cebb4ca36833233ded,
title = "Making the abject: problem-solving courts, addiction, mental illness and impairment",
abstract = "The advent of ‘problem-solving courts’ (e.g. drug courts, mental health courts and lists) is claimed by some to represent a significant shift in the administration of justice, through the adoption of a more ‘holistic’ and ‘generous’ approach to offenders. Although there is a large body of research examining the operation and efficacy of such courts, there is minimal critical research on how these courts conceptualise both ‘problems’ and ‘problem populations’, or the various implications thereof. In this chapter, we examine these issues via the theoretical framework of Carol Bacchi. Bacchi argues that policy ‘problems’ do not precede policy interventions, but that ‘problems’ are in fact constituted by and given meaning through implicit policy representations. This chapter extends this work further, considering how two Australian problem-solving courts (Victoria’s drug court and mental health list) conceptualise their target populations and the ‘problems’ they seek to solve in relation to them. The chapter considers how these processes constitute particular subjects (‘addicts’, the ‘disabled’ and the ‘mentally ill’) as abnormal, fixing connections, in the process, between drugs, disability, mental illness, normalcy and crime.",
author = "Claire Spivakovsky and Kate Seear",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138067370",
pages = "119--134",
editor = "Claire Spivanovsky and Kate Seear and Adrian Carter",
booktitle = "Critical Perspectives on Coercive Interventions",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "1st",

}

Spivakovsky, C & Seear, K 2018, Making the abject: problem-solving courts, addiction, mental illness and impairment. in C Spivanovsky, K Seear & A Carter (eds), Critical Perspectives on Coercive Interventions: Law, Medicine and Society. 1st edn, Routledge, Abingdon UK, pp. 119-134.

Making the abject : problem-solving courts, addiction, mental illness and impairment. / Spivakovsky, Claire; Seear, Kate.

Critical Perspectives on Coercive Interventions: Law, Medicine and Society. ed. / Claire Spivanovsky; Kate Seear; Adrian Carter. 1st. ed. Abingdon UK : Routledge, 2018. p. 119-134.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Otherpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Making the abject

T2 - problem-solving courts, addiction, mental illness and impairment

AU - Spivakovsky, Claire

AU - Seear, Kate

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The advent of ‘problem-solving courts’ (e.g. drug courts, mental health courts and lists) is claimed by some to represent a significant shift in the administration of justice, through the adoption of a more ‘holistic’ and ‘generous’ approach to offenders. Although there is a large body of research examining the operation and efficacy of such courts, there is minimal critical research on how these courts conceptualise both ‘problems’ and ‘problem populations’, or the various implications thereof. In this chapter, we examine these issues via the theoretical framework of Carol Bacchi. Bacchi argues that policy ‘problems’ do not precede policy interventions, but that ‘problems’ are in fact constituted by and given meaning through implicit policy representations. This chapter extends this work further, considering how two Australian problem-solving courts (Victoria’s drug court and mental health list) conceptualise their target populations and the ‘problems’ they seek to solve in relation to them. The chapter considers how these processes constitute particular subjects (‘addicts’, the ‘disabled’ and the ‘mentally ill’) as abnormal, fixing connections, in the process, between drugs, disability, mental illness, normalcy and crime.

AB - The advent of ‘problem-solving courts’ (e.g. drug courts, mental health courts and lists) is claimed by some to represent a significant shift in the administration of justice, through the adoption of a more ‘holistic’ and ‘generous’ approach to offenders. Although there is a large body of research examining the operation and efficacy of such courts, there is minimal critical research on how these courts conceptualise both ‘problems’ and ‘problem populations’, or the various implications thereof. In this chapter, we examine these issues via the theoretical framework of Carol Bacchi. Bacchi argues that policy ‘problems’ do not precede policy interventions, but that ‘problems’ are in fact constituted by and given meaning through implicit policy representations. This chapter extends this work further, considering how two Australian problem-solving courts (Victoria’s drug court and mental health list) conceptualise their target populations and the ‘problems’ they seek to solve in relation to them. The chapter considers how these processes constitute particular subjects (‘addicts’, the ‘disabled’ and the ‘mentally ill’) as abnormal, fixing connections, in the process, between drugs, disability, mental illness, normalcy and crime.

M3 - Chapter (Book)

SN - 9781138067370

SP - 119

EP - 134

BT - Critical Perspectives on Coercive Interventions

A2 - Spivanovsky, Claire

A2 - Seear, Kate

A2 - Carter, Adrian

PB - Routledge

CY - Abingdon UK

ER -

Spivakovsky C, Seear K. Making the abject: problem-solving courts, addiction, mental illness and impairment. In Spivanovsky C, Seear K, Carter A, editors, Critical Perspectives on Coercive Interventions: Law, Medicine and Society. 1st ed. Abingdon UK: Routledge. 2018. p. 119-134